These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22390741)

  • 1. Age-related trends of Stroop-like interference in animal size tests in 5- to 12-year-old children and young adults.
    Ikeda Y; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M
    Child Neuropsychol; 2013; 19(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 22390741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stroop-like interference in the real animal size test and the pictorial animal size test in 5- to 12-year-old children and young adults.
    Ikeda Y; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2014; 3(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 24716870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related trends of interference control in school-age children and young adults in the Stroop color-word test.
    Ikeda Y; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M; Haishi K
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Apr; 108(2):577-84. PubMed ID: 21675571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroop/reverse-Stroop interference in typical development and its relation to symptoms of ADHD.
    Ikeda Y; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Aug; 34(8):2391-8. PubMed ID: 23714715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Color-object interference: further tests of an executive control account.
    La Heij W; Boelens H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Jan; 108(1):156-69. PubMed ID: 20869723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adult age differences in the Color Stroop Test: a comparison between an Item-by-item and a Blocked version.
    Ludwig C; Borella E; Tettamanti M; de Ribaupierre A
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2010; 51(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19846224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time tracking of motor response activation and response competition in a Stroop task in young children: a lateralized readiness potential study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F; Bryce D; Whitebread D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2195-206. PubMed ID: 19296726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contributions of response set and semantic relatedness to cross-modal Stroop-like picture-word interference in children and adults.
    Hanauer JB; Brooks PJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):21-47. PubMed ID: 15596075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: separate developmental trends.
    Band GP; van der Molen MW; Overtoom CC; Verbaten MN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Apr; 75(4):263-90. PubMed ID: 10698613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related trends in Stroop and conflicting motor response task findings.
    Nichelli F; Scala G; Vago C; Riva D; Bulgheroni S
    Child Neuropsychol; 2005 Oct; 11(5):431-43. PubMed ID: 16306018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related differences in inhibitory control in the early school years.
    Macdonald JA; Beauchamp MH; Crigan JA; Anderson PJ
    Child Neuropsychol; 2014; 20(5):509-26. PubMed ID: 23909718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interference effects in a numerical Stroop paradigm in 9- to 12-year-old children with ADHD-C.
    Kaufmann L; Nuerk HC
    Child Neuropsychol; 2006 Jun; 12(3):223-43. PubMed ID: 16837397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related differences in reaction time task performance in young children.
    Kiselev S; Espy KA; Sheffield T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Feb; 102(2):150-66. PubMed ID: 18359494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Stroop revisited: a meta-analysis of interference control in AD/HD.
    van Mourik R; Oosterlaan J; Sergeant JA
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Feb; 46(2):150-65. PubMed ID: 15679524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sustained attention and response inhibition in young children at risk for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Berwid OG; Curko Kera EA; Marks DJ; Santra A; Bender HA; Halperin JM
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Nov; 46(11):1219-29. PubMed ID: 16238669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of test duration on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
    Klein M; Ponds RW; Houx PJ; Jolles J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1997 Feb; 19(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 9071643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separating intentional inhibition of prepotent responses and resistance to proactive interference in alcohol-dependent individuals.
    Noël X; Van der Linden M; Brevers D; Campanella S; Verbanck P; Hanak C; Kornreich C; Verbruggen F
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Mar; 128(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 22980674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Under what conditions do children have difficulty in inhibiting imitation? Evidence for the importance of planning specific responses.
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Aug; 109(4):512-24. PubMed ID: 21458827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interference resolution in the elderly: evidence suggestive of differences in strategy on measures of prepotent inhibition and dual task processing.
    Rekkas PV
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):341-65. PubMed ID: 16887778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for selective inhibitory impairment in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
    Christ SE; Kester LE; Bodner KE; Miles JH
    Neuropsychology; 2011 Nov; 25(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 21728431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.