These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22390741)

  • 21. The influence of stimulus-set size on developmental changes in cognitive control and conflict adaptation.
    Kray J; Karbach J; Blaye A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jun; 140(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 22622232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task.
    Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 29(Pt 1):138-47. PubMed ID: 21288259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments.
    Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I; Bonduelle M; Barnes J; Nekkebroeck J; Loft A; Wennerholm UB; Tarlatzis BC; Peters C; Hagberg BS; Berner A; Sutcliffe AG
    Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e283-9. PubMed ID: 15741353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Van den Bogaert T; Scherf F; Offeciers FE; Van de Heyning PH; Desloovere C; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; De Raeve L; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):178-90. PubMed ID: 19194296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies: assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Jan; 45(1):272-83. PubMed ID: 19210008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The development of automatic numerosity processing in preschoolers: evidence for numerosity-perceptual interference.
    Rousselle L; Noël MP
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Mar; 44(2):544-60. PubMed ID: 18331143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Aging and response inhibition: Normative data for the Victoria Stroop Test.
    Troyer AK; Leach L; Strauss E
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Mar; 13(1):20-35. PubMed ID: 16766341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Age-related trends of inhibitory control in Stroop-like big-small task in 3 to 12-year-old children and young adults.
    Ikeda Y; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():227. PubMed ID: 24672508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of inhibitory control in children's cooperative behaviors during a structured puzzle task.
    Giannotta F; Burk WJ; Ciairano S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Nov; 110(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 21645907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of the inhibitory component of the executive functions in children and adolescents.
    Leon-Carrion J; García-Orza J; Pérez-Santamaría FJ
    Int J Neurosci; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1291-311. PubMed ID: 15370187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prepotent response inhibition predicts treatment outcome in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    van der Oord S; Geurts HM; Prins PJ; Emmelkamp PM; Oosterlaan J
    Child Neuropsychol; 2012; 18(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 21819279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cue significance and response regulation in 3- to 6-year-old children's learning of multiple choice discrimination tasks.
    Bell JA; Livesey PJ
    Dev Psychobiol; 1985 May; 18(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 3987970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Children's susceptibility to retroactive interference: the effects of age and degree of learning.
    Lee K; Bussey K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Dec; 80(4):372-91. PubMed ID: 11689036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An asymmetric stroop/reverse-stroop interference phenomenon in ADHD.
    Song Y; Hakoda Y
    J Atten Disord; 2011 Aug; 15(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 20679153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inhibitory mechanisms in Down syndrome: is there a specific or general deficit?
    Borella E; Carretti B; Lanfranchi S
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Jan; 34(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 22940160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stroop interference and negative priming (NP) suppression in normal aging.
    Mayas J; Fuentes LJ; Ballesteros S
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2012; 54(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 21215468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Emotional modulation of the ability to inhibit a prepotent response during childhood.
    Urben S; Van der Linden M; Barisnikov K
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2012; 37(8):668-81. PubMed ID: 23145565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Stroop task: comparison between the original paradigm and computerized versions in children and adults.
    Penner IK; Kobel M; Stöcklin M; Weber P; Opwis K; Calabrese P
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2012; 26(7):1142-53. PubMed ID: 22928670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.