BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22391377)

  • 1. The use of pre-operative computed tomography in the assessment of the acute abdomen.
    Weir-McCall J; Shaw A; Arya A; Knight A; Howlett DC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2012 Mar; 94(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 22391377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of gastrointestinal causes of acute abdomen in elderly patients.
    Reginelli A; Russo A; Pinto A; Stanzione F; Martiniello C; Cappabianca S; Brunese L; Squillaci E
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12 Suppl 2():S181-S186. PubMed ID: 25157993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An audit of local discrepancy rates in acute abdominal CT: does subspecialist reporting reduce discrepancy rates?
    Wu Y; Das B; Shah V; Verma R; Stephenson JA
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Nov; 75(11):879.e7-879.e11. PubMed ID: 32891409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective study on the role of the CT scan in patients with an acute abdomen.
    Salem TA; Molloy RG; O'Dwyer PJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2005 Sep; 7(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 16108882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Journal club: Acute abdominal pain in elderly patients: effect of radiologist awareness of clinicobiologic information on CT accuracy.
    Millet I; Alili C; Bouic-Pages E; Curros-Doyon F; Nagot N; Taourel P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1171-8; quiz 1179. PubMed ID: 24261352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative accuracy of emergency CT in adults with non-traumatic abdominal pain.
    Perry H; Foley KG; Witherspoon J; Powell-Chandler A; Abdelrahman T; Roberts A; Lewis WG
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1059):20150416. PubMed ID: 26790835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in adults.
    Tsushima Y; Yamada S; Aoki J; Motojima T; Endo K
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Jun; 57(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 12069469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [What does the visceral surgeon need to know about computed tomography in the diagnostic work-up of the acute abdomen?].
    Wybranski C; Pech M; Fischbach K
    Zentralbl Chir; 2015 Feb; 140(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 24399506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance of Radiologists in Optimizing Outcomes for Older Americans with Acute Abdomen.
    Ricci KB; Oslock WM; Ingraham AM; Rushing AP; Diaz A; Paredes AZ; Daniel VT; Collins CE; Heh VK; Baselice HE; Strassels SA; Caterino JM; Santry HP
    J Surg Res; 2021 May; 261():361-368. PubMed ID: 33493888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of after-hours trauma cervical spine CT reporting by radiology trainees: Experiences from two Australian teaching hospitals.
    Woodford RM; Green L; Koo K; Williams C; Tran PV
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2022 Aug; 66(5):628-633. PubMed ID: 34541787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment on: The use of pre-operative computed tomography in the assessment of the acute abdomen.
    Khanzada Z; Lagatolla N
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2012 Sep; 94(6):449-50; author reply 450. PubMed ID: 22943352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute abdomen: Added diagnostic value of coronal reformations with 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography.
    Zangos S; Steenburg SD; Phillips KD; Kerl JM; Nguyen SA; Herzog C; Schoepf UJ; Vogl TJ; Costello P
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 17178362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Noncontrast CT in the Evaluation of Surgical Abdomen Patients.
    Li PH; Tee YS; Fu CY; Liao CH; Wang SY; Hsu YP; Yeh CN; Wu EH
    Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 29981641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Omental torsion, a rare cause of acute surgical abdomen.
    Le Roux F; Gennuso F; Lipsker A; Mauvais F
    J Visc Surg; 2013 Dec; 150(6):421-2. PubMed ID: 24269124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can pre-operative computed tomography predict resectability of ovarian carcinoma at primary laparotomy?
    Byrom J; Widjaja E; Redman CW; Jones PW; Tebby S
    BJOG; 2002 Apr; 109(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 12013156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain.
    van Randen A; Laméris W; van Es HW; van Heesewijk HP; van Ramshorst B; Ten Hove W; Bouma WH; van Leeuwen MS; van Keulen EM; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J; Boermeester MA;
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Jul; 21(7):1535-45. PubMed ID: 21365197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acute Mesenteric Infarction: The Chameleon of Acute Abdomen Evaluating the Quality of the Diagnostic Parameters in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia.
    Grotelueschen R; Miller V; Heidelmann LM; Melling N; Ghadban T; Grupp K; Reeh M; Welte MN; Uzunoglu FG; Izbicki JR; Bachmann KA
    Dig Surg; 2021; 38(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 33503619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of empiric abdominal computed tomography after urgent laparotomy for trauma: do they reveal unexpected injuries?
    Weis JJ; Cunningham KE; Forsythe RM; Billiar TR; Peitzman AB; Sperry JL
    Surgery; 2014 Oct; 156(4):979-85. PubMed ID: 25239355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the diagnostic value of computed tomography tractography in patients with abdominal stab wounds?
    Uzunosmanoğlu H; Çorbacıoğlu ŞK; Çevik Y; Akıncı E; Hacıfazlıoğlu Ç; Yavuz A; Yüzbaşıoğlu Y
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2017 Apr; 43(2):273-277. PubMed ID: 26742920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality.
    Hernandez JA; Swischuk LE; Angel CA; Chung D; Chandler R; Lee S
    Pediatr Radiol; 2005 Apr; 35(4):392-5. PubMed ID: 15635471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.