These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22391786)
1. Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: a comparative long-term study. Kochel J; Meyer-Marcotty P; Witt E; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Apr; 73(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 22391786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative assessment of two-phase class II treatment with Activator or Bionator followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective controlled before-and-after study. Abbing A; Koretsi V; Kalavritinos M; Schröder T; Eliades T; Papageorgiou SN Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100863. PubMed ID: 38428369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: a randomized clinical trial. Madian AM; Elfouly D BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):998. PubMed ID: 38093237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages. Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes. Marşan G Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample. Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapy. Malta LA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Faltin K; McNamara JA Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19852634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the stability of treatment with Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander and fixed orthodontics through counterpart analysis: A longitudinal follow-up study. de Arruda Aidar LA; Marchi LC; Fuerte S; Yamashita HK; Dominguez GC Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Feb; 26(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 35347846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study. Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group. Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment. Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term effects of the Forsus Device in Class II division I patients treated at pre-peak, peak, and post-peak growth periods: A retrospective study. Alhoraibi L; Alvetro L; Al-Jewair T Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):451-460. PubMed ID: 32778390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lateral cephalometric parameters among Arab skeletal classes II and III patients and applying machine learning models. Midlej K; Watted N; Awadi O; Masarwa S; Lone IM; Zohud O; Paddenberg E; Krohn S; Kuchler E; Proff P; Iraqi FA Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Sep; 28(9):511. PubMed ID: 39223280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphometric analysis of long-term dentoskeletal effects induced by treatment with Balters bionator. Bigliazzi R; Franchi L; Bertoz AP; McNamara JA; Faltin K; Bertoz FA Angle Orthod; 2015 Sep; 85(5):790-8. PubMed ID: 25469744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of anteroposterior and vertical stability 25 years after Angle class II division 1 treatment with cervical headgear. Braga Santos SR; Martins de Araújo T; Vogel CJ; Bastos de Oliveira M; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Braga E J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Nov; 82(6):382-390. PubMed ID: 33929557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cephalometric effects of Twin-block and van Beek Headgear-Activator in the correction of Class II malocclusion. Kirtane RS; Wiltshire WA; Thiruvenkatachari B; Shah A; Bittencourt Dutra Dos Santos P; Henrique de Sa Leitao Pinheiro F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 May; 163(5):677-689. PubMed ID: 36621351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of results in Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated by bionator]. Yiğit MD; Akin SZ Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 2489153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite. Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]