These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22391786)
21. Stability of Class II treatment with the Bionator followed by fixed appliances. Francisconi MF; Henriques JF; Janson G; Freitas KM; Santos PB J Appl Oral Sci; 2013; 21(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 24473721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [A cephalometric study on Twin-block appliance for treatment of early skeletal Class II malocclusion]. Liu Y; Liu YH Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):569-72. PubMed ID: 16400480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of angle Class II, division 1 treatment with jumping-the-bite appliances. A longitudinal study. Lisson JA; Tränkmann J J Orofac Orthop; 2002 Jan; 63(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 11974449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term dentoskeletal changes of class II growing patients' treatment with the propulseur universal light appliance. A prospective controlled study. Migliorati M; Drago S; Calzolari C; Gallo F; Dalessandri D; Orsini A; Silvestrini-Biavati A Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Apr; 69(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 32181609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment. Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances: a retrospective study. Zelderloo A; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Fieuws S; Willems G Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):334-341. PubMed ID: 27742730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative study of the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. De Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Ursi W Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12045763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular shape changes induced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion : A long-term evaluation. Franchi L; Pavoni C; Faltin K; Bigliazzi R; Gazzani F; Cozza P J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):325-33. PubMed ID: 27357583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mode of correction is related to treatment timing in Class II patients treated with the mandibular advancement locking unit (MALU) appliance. Candir M; Kerosuo H Angle Orthod; 2017 May; 87(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28121165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions. Binda SK; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maertens JK; van 't Hof MA Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 7957655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 appliance on cephalometric indices in patients with Class II division 1 versus division 2 malocclusions: A preliminary before-after clinical trial. Hemmatpour S; Molladavoodi P; Oliadarani FK; Bahrani H; Rakhshan V Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():38. PubMed ID: 34322214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transverse maxillary and mandibular growth during and after bionator therapy: study with metallic implants. Monini Ada C; Júnior LG; Maia LG; Pinto Ados S Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):72-9. PubMed ID: 24094014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances. Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the bionator. Ahn SJ; Kim JT; Nahm DS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 11395700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The surgical outcomes of anterior segmental osteotomy in Asian skeletal class II patients. Lee Y; Lim SW; Chan V; Hong P; Han SB; Chae HS Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Mar; 28(1):289-298. PubMed ID: 36773214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion with Klammt's Elastic Open Activator. Inamassu-Lemes SM; Fuziy A; Costa AL; Carvalho PE; Nahás-Scocate AC J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 27084865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantifying changes in incisor inclination before and after orthodontic treatment in class I, II, and III malocclusions. Kau CH; Bakos K; Lamani E J World Fed Orthod; 2020 Dec; 9(4):170-174. PubMed ID: 32948483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment timing for functional jaw orthopaedics followed by fixed appliances: a controlled long-term study. Pavoni C; Lombardo EC; Lione R; Faltin K; McNamara JA; Cozza P; Franchi L Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):430-436. PubMed ID: 29099926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]