These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22392672)

  • 1. How report cards on physicians, physician groups, and hospitals can have greater impact on consumer choices.
    Sinaiko AD; Eastman D; Rosenthal MB
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Mar; 31(3):602-11. PubMed ID: 22392672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A report card on provider report cards: current status of the health care transparency movement.
    Christianson JB; Volmar KM; Alexander J; Scanlon DP
    J Gen Intern Med; 2010 Nov; 25(11):1235-41. PubMed ID: 20625849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumers' Interest In Provider Ratings Grows, And Improved Report Cards And Other Steps Could Accelerate Their Use.
    Findlay SD
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2016 Apr; 35(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 27044970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why Do So Few Consumers Use Health Care Quality Report Cards? A Framework for Understanding the Limited Consumer Impact of Comparative Quality Information.
    Bhandari N; Scanlon DP; Shi Y; Smith RA
    Med Care Res Rev; 2019 Oct; 76(5):515-537. PubMed ID: 29745305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of quality report cards on choice of physicians, hospitals, and HMOs: a midcourse evaluation.
    Mukamel DB; Mushlin AI
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2001 Jan; 27(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 11147237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public reporting needed to improve the health of Tennesseans.
    Bailey JE; Gibson D
    Tenn Med; 2005 Nov; 98(11):539-40, 545. PubMed ID: 16375088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics and decision making of hospital report card consumers: Lessons from an onsite-based cross-sectional study.
    Emmert M; Kast K; Sander U
    Health Policy; 2019 Nov; 123(11):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 31383371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospital Quality Reporting in the United States: Does Report Card Design and Incorporation of Patient Narrative Comments Affect Hospital Choice?
    Emmert M; Schlesinger M
    Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 52(3):933-958. PubMed ID: 27324087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.
    Werner RM; Asch DA
    JAMA; 2005 Mar; 293(10):1239-44. PubMed ID: 15755946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital quality reports in Germany: patient and physician opinion of the reported quality indicators.
    Geraedts M; Schwartze D; Molzahn T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Sep; 7():157. PubMed ID: 17903244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Making the grade: a status report on hospital report cards.
    Health Syst Rev; 1997; 30(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 10173709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public reporting of provider performance: can its impact be made greater?
    Robinowitz DL; Dudley RA
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2006; 27():517-36. PubMed ID: 16533128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is Anyone Paying Attention to Physician Report Cards? The Impact of Increased Availability on Consumers' Awareness and Use of Physician Quality Information.
    Shi Y; Scanlon DP; Bhandari N; Christianson JB
    Health Serv Res; 2017 Aug; 52(4):1570-1589. PubMed ID: 27468943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information presentation features and comprehensibility of hospital report cards: design analysis and online survey among users.
    Sander U; Emmert M; Dickel J; Meszmer N; Kolb B
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Mar; 17(3):e68. PubMed ID: 25782186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Report cards don't make the grade with physicians or consumers.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 2002 Apr; 9(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 11963434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public reporting of hospital quality shows inconsistent ranking results.
    Emmert M; Taheri-Zadeh F; Kolb B; Sander U
    Health Policy; 2017 Jan; 121(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 27890391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grading the graders: how hospitals in California and New York perceive and interpret their report cards.
    Romano PS; Rainwater JA; Antonius D
    Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 10098573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.
    Bardach NS; Hibbard JH; Greaves F; Dudley RA
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e102. PubMed ID: 25934100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The California Hospital Outcomes Project: how useful is California's report card for quality improvement?
    Rainwater JA; Romano PS; Antonius DM
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1998 Jan; 24(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 9494872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations.
    Ketelaar NA; Faber MJ; Flottorp S; Rygh LH; Deane KH; Eccles MP
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Nov; (11):CD004538. PubMed ID: 22071813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.