These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22392996)

  • 1. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses.
    White C; Halpern BS; Kappel CV
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(12):4696-701. PubMed ID: 22392996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marine spatial planning makes room for offshore aquaculture in crowded coastal waters.
    Lester SE; Stevens JM; Gentry RR; Kappel CV; Bell TW; Costello CJ; Gaines SD; Kiefer DA; Maue CC; Rensel JE; Simons RD; Washburn L; White C
    Nat Commun; 2018 Mar; 9(1):945. PubMed ID: 29507321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bright spots as climate-smart marine spatial planning tools for conservation and blue growth.
    Queirós AM; Talbot E; Beaumont NJ; Somerfield PJ; Kay S; Pascoe C; Dedman S; Fernandes JA; Jueterbock A; Miller PI; Sailley SF; Sará G; Carr LM; Austen MC; Widdicombe S; Rilov G; Levin LA; Hull SC; Walmsley SF; Nic Aonghusa C
    Glob Chang Biol; 2021 Nov; 27(21):5514-5531. PubMed ID: 34486773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Typology and indicators of ecosystem services for marine spatial planning and management.
    Böhnke-Henrichs A; Baulcomb C; Koss R; Hussain SS; de Groot RS
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 130():135-45. PubMed ID: 24076513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.
    Gaines SD; White C; Carr MH; Palumbi SR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18286-93. PubMed ID: 20200311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of spatial information in MPA network design.
    Costello C; Rassweiler A; Siegel D; De Leo G; Micheli F; Rosenberg A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18294-9. PubMed ID: 20176962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A spatial risk approach towards integrated marine spatial planning: A case study on European hake nursery areas in the North Alboran Sea.
    Muñoz M; Reul A; Gil de Sola L; Lauerburg RAM; Tello O; Gimpel A; Stelzenmüller V
    Mar Environ Res; 2018 Nov; 142():190-207. PubMed ID: 30361105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. This is more difficult than we thought! The responsibility of scientists, managers and stakeholders to mitigate the unsustainability of marine fisheries.
    Caddy JF; Seijo JC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jan; 360(1453):59-75. PubMed ID: 15713588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature.
    Arkema KK; Verutes GM; Wood SA; Clarke-Samuels C; Rosado S; Canto M; Rosenthal A; Ruckelshaus M; Guannel G; Toft J; Faries J; Silver JM; Griffin R; Guerry AD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7390-5. PubMed ID: 26082545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the effect of the spatial scale of fishery management.
    Takashina N; Baskett ML
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Feb; 390():14-22. PubMed ID: 26593243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating scientific guidance into marine spatial planning.
    Rassweiler A; Costello C; Hilborn R; Siegel DA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Apr; 281(1781):20132252. PubMed ID: 24573841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sampling mobile oceanic fishes and sharks: implications for fisheries and conservation planning.
    Letessier TB; Bouchet PJ; Meeuwig JJ
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 May; 92(2):627-646. PubMed ID: 26680116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ecosystem objectives to support the UK vision for the marine environment.
    Rogers SI; Tasker ML; Earll R; Gubbay S
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Feb; 54(2):128-44. PubMed ID: 17223138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ocean zoning for conservation, fisheries and marine renewable energy: assessing trade-offs and co-location opportunities.
    Yates KL; Schoeman DS; Klein CJ
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 152():201-9. PubMed ID: 25684567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marine protected areas and the value of spatially optimized fishery management.
    Rassweiler A; Costello C; Siegel DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jul; 109(29):11884-9. PubMed ID: 22753469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using grizzly bears to assess harvest-ecosystem tradeoffs in salmon fisheries.
    Levi T; Darimont CT; Macduffee M; Mangel M; Paquet P; Wilmers CC
    PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(4):e1001303. PubMed ID: 22505845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maritime Spatial Planning supported by systematic site selection: Applying Marxan for offshore wind power in the western Baltic Sea.
    Göke C; Dahl K; Mohn C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194362. PubMed ID: 29543878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right incentives enable ocean sustainability successes and provide hope for the future.
    Lubchenco J; Cerny-Chipman EB; Reimer JN; Levin SA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Dec; 113(51):14507-14514. PubMed ID: 27911770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A risk-based approach to cumulative effects assessment for large marine ecosystems to support transboundary marine spatial planning: A case study of the yellow sea.
    Ma C; Stelzenmüller V; Rehren J; Yu J; Zhang Z; Zheng H; Lin L; Yang HC; Jin Y
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Sep; 342():118165. PubMed ID: 37201394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Global fishery development patterns are driven by profit but not trophic level.
    Sethi SA; Branch TA; Watson R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jul; 107(27):12163-7. PubMed ID: 20566867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.