197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22393160)
1. Evaluation of middle cerebral artery stents using multidetector row CT angiography in vivo study: comparison of the three different kernels.
Jang JH; Lim YS; Lee YJ; Yoo WJ; Sung MS; Kim BS
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 22393160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of vertebral artery stents using 16-slice multi-detector row CT angiography in vivo evaluation: comparison of a medium-smooth kernel and a sharp kernel.
Yoo WJ; Lim YS; Ahn KJ; Choi BG; Kim JY; Kim SH
Eur J Radiol; 2009 May; 70(2):362-8. PubMed ID: 18359179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo evaluation of carotid artery stents using multi-detector-row computed tomography angiography: comparison of 3 kernels.
Lee YJ; Lim YS; Jung NY; Yoo WJ; Sung MS; Chung MH; Kim BS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 23674012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography.
Lee YJ; Lim YS; Lim HW; Yoo WJ; Choi BG; Kim BS
Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):1000-7. PubMed ID: 24107930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid artery stents on CT angiography: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners.
Lettau M; Kotter E; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
J Neuroradiol; 2014 Oct; 41(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 24411522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of various image reconstruction parameters in lower extremity stents using multidetector-row CT angiography: initial findings.
Heuschmid M; Wiesinger B; Tepe G; Luz O; Kopp AF; Claussen CD; Duda SH
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):265-71. PubMed ID: 16733677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of different reconstruction parameters in the visualization of intracranial stents using C-arm flat panel CT angiography: experience in an animal model.
Ott S; Struffert T; Saake M; Gölitz P; Adamek E; Doerfler A
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 25711233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-arterial DynaCT angiography: an alternative tool to assess the patency of intracranial stent lumen.
Hu J; Shi S; Xie S; Tang X; Chen K; Mu W
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 130():105-9. PubMed ID: 25603123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coronary stent imaging with dual-source CT: assessment of lumen visibility using different convolution kernels and postprocessing filters.
Ulrich A; Burg MC; Raupach R; Bunck A; Schuelke C; Maintz D; Heindel W; Seifarth H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 24399513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.
de Graaf FR; Schuijf JD; van Velzen JE; Boogers MJ; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Sieders A; Spanó F; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.
Maintz D; Seifarth H; Raupach R; Flohr T; Rink M; Sommer T; Ozgün M; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Eur Radiol; 2006 Apr; 16(4):818-26. PubMed ID: 16333623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stent Lumen Visibility in Single-energy CT Angiography: Does Tube Potential Matter?
Boos J; Kröpil P; Lanzman RS; Aissa J; Schleich C; Antoch G; Thomas C
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):752-9. PubMed ID: 27161829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computed tomography coronary stent imaging with iterative reconstruction: a trade-off study between medium kernel and sharp kernel.
Zhou Q; Jiang B; Dong F; Huang P; Liu H; Zhang M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(4):604-12. PubMed ID: 24651753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.
Lettau M; Sauer A; Heiland S; Rohde S; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Nov; 30(10):1993-7. PubMed ID: 19749216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: initial experience.
Hong C; Chrysant GS; Woodard PK; Bae KT
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):286-91. PubMed ID: 15304660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomographic angiography in evaluation of superficial temporal to middle cerebral artery bypass.
Besachio DA; Ziegler JI; Duncan TD; Wanebo JS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):437-9. PubMed ID: 20498550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proximal arterial diameters on CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography correlate both at admission and in the vasospasm period after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Kerkeni H; Schatlo B; Dan-Ura H; Remonda L; Muroi C; Diepers M; Fandino J; Fathi AR
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2015; 120():171-5. PubMed ID: 25366619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surveillance imaging after intracranial stent implantation: non-invasive imaging compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Golshani B; Lazzaro MA; Raslau F; Darkhabani Z; Baruah D; Eastwood D; Fitzsimmons BF; Zaidat OO
J Neurointerv Surg; 2013 Jul; 5(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22641863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated subtraction CT angiography for visualization of the whole brain vasculature: a feasibility study.
Li Q; Lv F; Wei Y; Luo T; Xie P
Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):1009-14. PubMed ID: 23746383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
