These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22393582)

  • 1. Strong reciprocity is real, but there is no evidence that uncoordinated costly punishment sustains cooperation in the wild.
    Guala F
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 22393582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.
    Guala F
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 22289303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The social structure of cooperation and punishment.
    Gintis H; Fehr E
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 22289317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The strategic logic of costly punishment necessitates natural field experiments, and at least one such experiment exists.
    Johnson T
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 22289321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment.
    Casari M
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 22289310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is strong reciprocity really strong in the lab, let alone in the real world?
    Güney Ş; Newell BR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):29. PubMed ID: 22289318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The punishment that sustains cooperation is often coordinated and costly.
    Bowles S; Boyd R; Mathew S; Richerson PJ
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 22289309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lab support for strong reciprocity is weak: punishing for reputation rather than cooperation.
    Shaw A; Santos L
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):39. PubMed ID: 22289329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reciprocity and uncertainty.
    Bereby-Meyer Y
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 22289307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In the lab and the field: punishment is rare in equilibrium.
    Gächter S
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 22289316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perspectives from ethnography on weak and strong reciprocity.
    Wiessner P
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 22289335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proximate and ultimate causes of punishment and strong reciprocity.
    Barclay P
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 22289305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In medio stat virtus: theoretical and methodological extremes regarding reciprocity will not explain complex social behaviors.
    Civai C; Langus A
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 22289311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails.
    Rand DG; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18938180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The restorative logic of punishment: another argument in favor of weak selection.
    Baumard N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 22289306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment.
    Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y; Nowak MA
    Nature; 2009 Jan; 457(7225):79-82. PubMed ID: 19122640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strong reciprocity is not uncommon in the "wild".
    Runciman WG
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 22289328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retaliation and antisocial punishment are overlooked in many theoretical models as well as behavioral experiments.
    Dreber A; Rand DG
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):24. PubMed ID: 22289313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards a unified theory of reciprocity.
    Rosas A
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 22289326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Culture: the missing piece in theories of weak and strong reciprocity.
    Read D
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 22289325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.