These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
677 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22393971)
1. Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas. Akita H; Okamura T; Ando R; Nagata D; Naruyama H; Yamada Y; Naiki T; Yasui T; Tozawa K; Kohri K Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):2959-61. PubMed ID: 22393971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer]. Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Han M; Partin AW; Zahurak M; Piantadosi S; Epstein JI; Walsh PC J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 12544300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome. De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overexpression of Cdc20 in clinically localized prostate cancer: Relation to high Gleason score and biochemical recurrence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Mao Y; Li K; Lu L; Si-Tu J; Lu M; Gao X Cancer Biomark; 2016; 16(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 26889981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer. Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen. San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction on the basis of preoperative and postoperative tumor characteristics. Graefen M; Noldus J; Pichlmeier U; Haese A; Hammerer P; Fernandez S; Conrad S; Henke R; Huland E; Huland H Eur Urol; 1999; 36(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10364651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of the Biochemical Recurrence risk between Radical Prostatectomy and Brachytherapy in the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer]. Martínez PF; Belisle DF; Cristallo C; Tobía I; Damia O; Villamil W; Giudice CR Arch Esp Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(8):655-60. PubMed ID: 26437328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer. Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of age on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Ozden C; Aktas BK; Bulut S; Erbay G; Tagci S; Gokkaya CS; Baykam MM; Memis A Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 33(2):91-95. PubMed ID: 28137417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients. Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report. Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score. Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Roberts SG; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Zincke H Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 11393495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]