148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22395145)
1. Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Twijnstra AR; Blikkendaal MD; van Zwet EW; van Kesteren PJ; de Kroon CD; Jansen FW
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 119(4):700-8. PubMed ID: 22395145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of surgical volume on outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications.
Wallenstein MR; Ananth CV; Kim JH; Burke WM; Hershman DL; Lewin SN; Neugut AI; Lu YS; Herzog TJ; Wright JD
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 119(4):709-16. PubMed ID: 22433333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Janssen PF; Brölmann HA; van Kesteren PJ; Bongers MY; Thurkow AL; Heymans MW; Huirne JA
BJOG; 2011 Dec; 118(13):1568-75. PubMed ID: 21895949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical relevance of conversion rate and its evaluation in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Twijnstra AR; Blikkendaal MD; van Zwet EW; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 23312244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors to predict the incidence of surgical adverse events following open or laparoscopic surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial.
Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S; Janda M; Gebski V; Baker J; Brand A; Hogg R; Jobling TW; Land R; Manolitsas T; Nascimento M; Neesham D; Nicklin JL; Oehler MK; Otton G; Perrin L; Salfinger S; Hammond I; Leung Y; Sykes P; Ngan H; Garrett A; Laney M; Ng TY; Tam K; Chan K; Wrede DH; Pather S; Simcock B; Farrell R; Robertson G; Walker G; McCartney A; Obermair A
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 48(14):2155-62. PubMed ID: 22503396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
Huang CC; Wu MP; Huang YT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22300773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dynamic quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy to measure surgical outcomes.
Driessen SR; Van Zwet EW; Haazebroek P; Sandberg EM; Blikkendaal MD; Twijnstra AR; Jansen FW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):754.e1-754.e8. PubMed ID: 27402052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective comparison of tissue trauma after laparoscopic hysterectomy types with retroperitoneal lateral transsection of uterine vessels using ligasure and abdominal hysterectomy.
Demir A; Bige O; Saatli B; Solak A; Saygili U; Onvural A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 17952446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FINHYST, a prospective study of 5279 hysterectomies: complications and their risk factors.
Brummer TH; Jalkanen J; Fraser J; Heikkinen AM; Kauko M; Mäkinen J; Seppälä T; Sjöberg J; Tomás E; Härkki P
Hum Reprod; 2011 Jul; 26(7):1741-51. PubMed ID: 21540244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.
Donnez O; Jadoul P; Squifflet J; Donnez J
BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):492-500. PubMed ID: 19016683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical management of uterine fibroids in Hesse, Germany, between 1998 and 2004.
Hackethal A; Brüggmann D; Leis A; Langde S; Stillger R; Münstedt K
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):862-8. PubMed ID: 18304546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of surgical volume on outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
Wright JD; Hershman DL; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Lewin SN; Herzog TJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):948-58. PubMed ID: 21989660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study.
Rosen DM; Shukla A; Cario GM; Carlton MA; Chou D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 18971137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma.
Zurawin RK; Fischer JH; Amir L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 20226411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison study of single-port (Octoport™) and four-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Wang T; Chong GO; Park NY; Hong DG; Lee YS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 22261467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Operating time and blood loss during laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with in situ morcellation.
Chou LY; Sheu BC; Chang DY; Chen SY; Huang SC; Hsu WC; Chang WC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):985-9. PubMed ID: 21615713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
