These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22395272)

  • 1. The effect of nonleading foot placement on power and velocity in the fencing lunge.
    Gresham-Fiegel CN; House PD; Zupan MF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Jan; 27(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22395272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foot loading characteristics during three fencing-specific movements.
    Trautmann C; Martinelli N; Rosenbaum D
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Dec; 29(15):1585-92. PubMed ID: 22077403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinematic determinants of weapon velocity during the fencing lunge in experienced épée fencers.
    Bottoms L; Greenhalgh A; Sinclair J
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2013; 15(4):109-13. PubMed ID: 24479483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical insights into the determinants of speed in the fencing lunge.
    Guan Y; Guo L; Wu N; Zhang L; Warburton DER
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2018 Mar; 18(2):201-208. PubMed ID: 29249174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Barometric and Spatiotemporal Gait Differences Between Leading and Nonleading Feet of Handball Players.
    Ameer MA; Kamel MI; Ali SA
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2022; 112(5):. PubMed ID: 36251596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical Characteristics Underpinning Lunging and Change of Direction Speed in Fencing.
    Turner A; Bishop C; Chavda S; Edwards M; Brazier J; Kilduff LP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Aug; 30(8):2235-41. PubMed ID: 26808849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of surface on impact shock experienced during a fencing lunge.
    Greenhalgh A; Bottoms L; Sinclair J
    J Appl Biomech; 2013 Aug; 29(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 22923353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of Plantar Loads in Maximum Forward Lunge Tasks in Badminton.
    Hu X; Li JX; Hong Y; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137558. PubMed ID: 26367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Staying Out of Range: Increasing Attacking Distance in Fencing.
    Turner AN; Marshall G; Noto A; Chavda S; Atlay N; Kirby D
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2017 Nov; 12(10):1319-1323. PubMed ID: 28290725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis of standing long jump from varying starting positions.
    Mackala K; Stodółka J; Siemienski A; Coh M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Oct; 27(10):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22652918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of uncertainty on the reaction response in fencing.
    Gutiérrez-Dávila M; Javier Rojas F; Antonio R; Navarro E
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2013 Mar; 84(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 23611004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Fencers Require a Weapon-Specific Approach to Strength and Conditioning Training?
    Turner AN; Bishop CJ; Cree JA; Edwards ML; Chavda S; Read PJ; Kirby DMJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jun; 31(6):1662-1668. PubMed ID: 28538318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of defence response time during lunge in foil fencing.
    Gutiérrez-Cruz C; Rojas FJ; Gutiérrez-Davila M
    J Sports Sci; 2016; 34(7):651-7. PubMed ID: 26185981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinematic determinants of scoring success in the fencing flick: Logistic and linear multiple regression analysis.
    Michaelsen AN; Cleland CL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222075. PubMed ID: 31553734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The consistency of individual-selected versus rater-determined angle and base of gait.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW; Taylor O; Pomeroy M; Mufti J; Kuhlman H; Ehlers D; Carrell D
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 May; 104(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 24901583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of base of support on early postural adjustments and fencing lunge performance.
    Akbaş A; Marszałek W; Bacik B; Juras G
    Sports Biomech; 2024 Oct; 23(10):1783-1795. PubMed ID: 34641774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lunge performance and its determinants.
    Cronin J; McNair PJ; Marshall RN
    J Sports Sci; 2003 Jan; 21(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 12587891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender differences in patellofemoral load during the epee fencing lunge.
    Sinclair J; Bottoms L
    Res Sports Med; 2015; 23(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 25630246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In fencing, does intensive practice equally improve the speed performance of the touche when it is performed alone and in combination with the lunge?
    Yiou E; Do MC
    Int J Sports Med; 2000 Feb; 21(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 10727073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In a complex sequential movement, what component of the motor program is improved with intensive practice, sequence timing or ensemble motor learning?
    Yiou E; Do MC
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 11315548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.