BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22396137)

  • 1. Checking and bootstrapping lexical norms by means of word similarity indexes.
    Bestgen Y; Vincze N
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):998-1006. PubMed ID: 22396137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducing affective norms with lexical co-occurrence statistics: Predicting valence, arousal, and dominance.
    Recchia G; Louwerse MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1584-98. PubMed ID: 24998307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.
    Scott GG; Keitel A; Becirspahic M; Yao B; Sereno SC
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1258-1270. PubMed ID: 30206797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words.
    Yao Z; Wu J; Zhang Y; Wang Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1374-1385. PubMed ID: 27553483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Nature of Word Associations in Sentence Contexts.
    Planchuelo C; Buades-Sitjar F; Hinojosa JA; Duñabeitia JA
    Exp Psychol; 2022 Mar; 69(2):104-110. PubMed ID: 35694734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.
    Bonin P; Méot A; Bugaiska A
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2366-2387. PubMed ID: 29435912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables?
    Mandera P; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1623-42. PubMed ID: 25695623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic gender: Norms for 24,000 Dutch words and its role in word meaning.
    Vankrunkelsven H; Yang Y; Brysbaert M; De Deyne S; Storms G
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Jan; 56(1):113-125. PubMed ID: 36471212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying social semantics: An inclusive definition of socialness and ratings for 8388 English words.
    Diveica V; Pexman PM; Binney RJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):461-473. PubMed ID: 35286618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic similarity: normative ratings for 185 Spanish noun triplets.
    Moldovan CD; Ferré P; Demestre J; Sánchez-Casas R
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):788-99. PubMed ID: 24984982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity to emotion information in children's lexical processing.
    Lund TC; Sidhu DM; Pexman PM
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():61-71. PubMed ID: 31026671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating affective word covariates using word association data.
    Van Rensbergen B; De Deyne S; Storms G
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1644-1652. PubMed ID: 26511372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
    Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory effects of semantic attributes: A method of controlling attribute contamination.
    Brainerd CJ; Bialer DM; Chang M
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2910-2939. PubMed ID: 36002626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping semantic space: property norms and semantic richness.
    Muraki EJ; Sidhu DM; Pexman PM
    Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):637-649. PubMed ID: 31552508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. WINDSORS: Windsor improved norms of distance and similarity of representations of semantics.
    Durda K; Buchanan L
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Aug; 40(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 18697665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) for Italian.
    Montefinese M; Ambrosini E; Fairfield B; Mammarella N
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):887-903. PubMed ID: 24150921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in semantic processing: Insights from the Calgary semantic decision project.
    Pexman PM; Yap MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1091-1112. PubMed ID: 29481104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Affective norms for 380 Spanish words belonging to three different semantic categories.
    Ferré P; Guasch M; Moldovan C; Sánchez-Casas R
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 22042646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for semantic involvement in regular and exception word reading in emergent readers of English.
    Ricketts J; Davies R; Masterson J; Stuart M; Duff FJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():330-345. PubMed ID: 27416563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.