These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22396209)

  • 1. Effects of stick design features on perceptions of characteristics of cigarettes.
    Borland R; Savvas S
    Tob Control; 2013 Sep; 22(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22396209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of variant descriptors on the potential effectiveness of plain packaging.
    Borland R; Savvas S
    Tob Control; 2014 Jan; 23(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23436139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Hammond D; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2012 Sep; 21(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 21998127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adolescent perceptions of dissuasive sticks: a web survey among 16-20 year olds in Norway.
    Lund I; Scheffels J
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):974. PubMed ID: 30081848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of structural packaging design on young adult smokers' perceptions of tobacco products.
    Borland R; Savvas S; Sharkie F; Moore K
    Tob Control; 2013 Mar; 22(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22166265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.
    Wakefield MA; Germain D; Durkin SJ
    Tob Control; 2008 Dec; 17(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 18827035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cigarette stick as valuable communicative real estate: a content analysis of cigarettes from 14 low-income and middle-income countries.
    C Smith K; Washington C; Welding K; Kroart L; Osho A; Cohen JE
    Tob Control; 2016 Sep; 26(5):604-607. PubMed ID: 27534777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of premium vs masked cigarette brand names on the experienced taste of a cigarette after tobacco plain packaging in Australia: an experimental study.
    Skaczkowski G; Durkin S; Kashima Y; Wakefield M
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Mar; 18(1):295. PubMed ID: 29526164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Filter presence and tipping paper color influence consumer perceptions of cigarettes.
    O'Connor RJ; Bansal-Travers M; Cummings KM; Hammond D; Thrasher JF; Tworek C
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Dec; 15():1279. PubMed ID: 26695774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissuasive cigarette sticks: the next step in standardised ('plain') packaging?
    Hoek J; Gendall P; Eckert C; Louviere J
    Tob Control; 2016 Nov; 25(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 26676026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cigarette design and marketing features are associated with increased smoking susceptibility and perception of reduced harm among smokers in 27 EU countries.
    Agaku IT; Omaduvie UT; Filippidis FT; Vardavas CI
    Tob Control; 2015 Dec; 24(e4):e233-40. PubMed ID: 25335899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom.
    Hammond D; Daniel S; White CM
    J Adolesc Health; 2013 Feb; 52(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 23332478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of premium versus value brand names on the smoking experience in a plain packaging environment: an experimental study.
    Skaczkowski G; Durkin S; Kashima Y; Wakefield M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e014099. PubMed ID: 28093441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among Mexican youth.
    Mutti S; Hammond D; Reid JL; White CM; Thrasher JF
    Health Promot Int; 2017 Aug; 32(4):650-659. PubMed ID: 26826368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adolescent perceptions of cigarette appearance.
    Ford A; Moodie C; MacKintosh AM; Hastings G
    Eur J Public Health; 2014 Jun; 24(3):464-8. PubMed ID: 24158317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer Perceptions of Cigarette Design in France: A Comparison of Regular, Slim, Pink and Plain Cigarettes.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Guignard R; Eker F; Béguinot E
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2019 Jun; 21(7):911-917. PubMed ID: 29800331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deadly in pink: the impact of cigarette packaging among young women.
    Doxey J; Hammond D
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 21478476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review of smoker and non-smoker perceptions of visually unappealing cigarette sticks.
    Drovandi A; Teague PA; Glass B; Malau-Aduli B
    Tob Induc Dis; 2018; 16():02. PubMed ID: 31516403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of cigarette pack shape, size and opening: evidence from tobacco company documents.
    Kotnowski K; Hammond D
    Addiction; 2013 Sep; 108(9):1658-68. PubMed ID: 23600674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: a naturalistic approach.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 24920573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.