These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22396226)

  • 1. A novel MRI-compatible brain ventricle phantom for validation of segmentation and volumetry methods.
    Khan AF; Drozd JJ; Moreland RK; Ta RM; Borrie MJ; Bartha R;
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Aug; 36(2):476-82. PubMed ID: 22396226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An MRI digital brain phantom for validation of segmentation methods.
    Alfano B; Comerci M; Larobina M; Prinster A; Hornak JP; Selvan SE; Amato U; Quarantelli M; Tedeschi G; Brunetti A; Salvatore M
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Jun; 15(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 21317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Twenty new digital brain phantoms for creation of validation image data bases.
    Aubert-Broche B; Griffin M; Pike GB; Evans AC; Collins DL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Nov; 25(11):1410-6. PubMed ID: 17117770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A volume resolution phantom for MRI.
    Moon SY; Hornak JP
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 28(2):286-9. PubMed ID: 19695820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Impact of technical and morphological factors on the precision of software-based MR tumor volumetry: a phantom study].
    Rohde S; Massberg M; Reinhardt J; Sartor K; Heiland S
    Rofo; 2008 Jul; 180(7):654-61. PubMed ID: 18512193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter assessment of reliability of cranial MRI.
    Ewers M; Teipel SJ; Dietrich O; Schönberg SO; Jessen F; Heun R; Scheltens P; van de Pol L; Freymann NR; Moeller HJ; Hampel H
    Neurobiol Aging; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1051-9. PubMed ID: 16169126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and construction of a brain phantom to simulate neonatal MR images.
    Kazemi K; Moghaddam HA; Grebe R; Gondry-Jouet C; Wallois F
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2011 Apr; 35(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 21146956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance images using a decision tree with spatial information.
    Chao WH; Chen YY; Lin SH; Shih YY; Tsang S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 19097854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic phantom with heart, lung, and blood motion for initial validation of MRI techniques.
    Swailes NE; MacDonald ME; Frayne R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Oct; 34(4):941-6. PubMed ID: 21769980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of different contributions of scatter and attenuation on the threshold values in contrast-based algorithms for volume segmentation.
    Matheoud R; Della Monica P; Secco C; Loi G; Krengli M; Inglese E; Brambilla M
    Phys Med; 2011 Jan; 27(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 20399128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactive deformation registration of endorectal prostate MRI using ITK thin plate splines.
    Cheung MR; Krishnan K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 19201364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Method to correct intensity inhomogeneity in MR images for atherosclerosis characterization.
    Salvado O; Hillenbrand C; Zhang S; Wilson DL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 16689259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atlas-based automatic segmentation of MR images: validation study on the brainstem in radiotherapy context.
    Bondiau PY; Malandain G; Chanalet S; Marcy PY; Habrand JL; Fauchon F; Paquis P; Courdi A; Commowick O; Rutten I; Ayache N
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):289-98. PubMed ID: 15629622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feedback-assisted three-dimensional reconstruction of the left ventricle with MRI.
    Swingen CM; Seethamraju RT; Jerosch-Herold M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 May; 17(5):528-37. PubMed ID: 12720262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semi-automated volumetric analysis of artificial lymph nodes in a phantom study.
    Fabel M; Biederer J; Jochens A; Bornemann L; Soza G; Heller M; Bolte H
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):e451-7. PubMed ID: 21094010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Voxel-based iterative sensitivity (VBIS) analysis: methods and a validation of intensity scaling for T2-weighted imaging of hippocampal sclerosis.
    Abbott DF; Pell GS; Pardoe H; Jackson GD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):812-9. PubMed ID: 18996207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unifying framework for multimodal brain MRI segmentation based on Hidden Markov Chains.
    Bricq S; Collet Ch; Armspach JP
    Med Image Anal; 2008 Dec; 12(6):639-52. PubMed ID: 18440268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic brain phantom for intracranial volume measurements.
    Basati SS; Harris TJ; Linninger AA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1450-5. PubMed ID: 20501343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted cervical MRI at 3T: comparison with two-dimensional T2-weighted sequences.
    Kwon JW; Yoon YC; Choi SH
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Feb; 67(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 22142499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.