These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2239695)

  • 1. Contrast media: the relation of chemical structure, animal toxicity and adverse clinical effects.
    Almén T
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Oct; 66(14):2F-8F. PubMed ID: 2239695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonionic contrast media are less nephrotoxic than ionic contrast media to rat renal cortical slices.
    Soejima K; Uozumi J; Kanou T; Fujiyama C; Masaki Z
    Toxicol Lett; 2003 Jun; 143(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 12697376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ionic versus nonionic contrast use.
    Stolberg HO; McClennan BL
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 1991; 20(2):47-88. PubMed ID: 2049958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assays for plasma complement activation by x-ray contrast media.
    Eaton S; Tsay HM; Yost F; Tweedle MF
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Jul; 25(7):789-92. PubMed ID: 2391195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibition of gluconeogenesis and p-aminohipuric acid accumulation in rat renal cortical slices by ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Nakamura M; Uozumi J; Soejima K; Kanou T; Tokuda N; Naito S
    Clin Exp Nephrol; 2003 Jun; 7(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 14586727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonionic contrast agents and coagulation.
    Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Nov; 23 Suppl 2():S310-7. PubMed ID: 3058638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Miscellaneous adverse effects of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media: a study revised.
    Brismar J; Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1826061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
    Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
    Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective survey of delayed adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Yamaguchi K; Takanashi I; Kanauchi T; Hoshi T; Kubota H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov; 52(11):1565-70. PubMed ID: 1465338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents.
    Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8282499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pharmacology of nonionic roentgen contrast media].
    Turnheim K
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1986 May; 98(11):333-8. PubMed ID: 3727593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute damage to human endothelial cells by brief exposure to contrast media in vitro.
    Laerum F
    Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):681-4. PubMed ID: 6844604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on cardiohemodynamics and quality of radiographic image during canine angiography.
    Nakamura H; Kurata M; Haruta K; Takeda K
    J Vet Med Sci; 1994 Feb; 56(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8204767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of ventricular fibrillation during left coronary arteriography in pigs: comparison of a solution of the nonionic dimer iodixanol with solutions of five different nonionic monomers.
    Chai CM; Karlsson JO; Almén T
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 18300138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
    Lovett I; Benn I; Benness G; Doust B
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of the side effects of urographic contrast media (iothalamate, diatrizoate, iodamide, iopamidol) within the scope of a CT study].
    Stellamor K; Hruby W; Assinger S; Luckner H
    Radiologe; 1984 Oct; 24(10):488-90. PubMed ID: 6505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Work in progress: reduction of calcium activity by radiopaque contrast media.
    Morris TW; Sahler LG; Violante M; Fischer HW
    Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 6856865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urography with iohexol. Comparison with metrizoate and iodamide.
    Edgren J; Kivisaari A; Laasonen L; Standertskiöld-Nordenstam CG
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():46-9. PubMed ID: 6382934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cytostatic effects of radiographic contrast media in synchronized cell cultures.
    Nordby A; Halgunset J; Haugen OA
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Aug; 22(8):678-84. PubMed ID: 3312081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Iodinated contrast media and contrast-induced nephropathy: is there a preferred cost-effective agent?
    Sharma SK
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 May; 20(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 18460711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.