These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2239740)

  • 1. Frequencies of reactions to iohexol versus ioxaglate.
    Vacek JL; Gersema L; Woods M; Bower C; Beauchamp GD
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 66(17):1277-8. PubMed ID: 2239740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Juergens CP; Khaing AM; McIntyre GJ; Leung DY; Lo ST; Fernandes C; Hopkins AP
    Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of iohexol and ioxaglate in selective coronary angiography.
    Haagen FD; Lok D; Pasteuning H
    Can J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 3 Suppl A():16A-20A. PubMed ID: 3435850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
    Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percutaneous coronary angioscopic comparison of thrombus formation during percutaneous coronary angioplasty with ionic and nonionic low osmolality contrast media in unstable angina.
    Qureshi NR; den Heijer P; Crijns HJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 80(6):700-4. PubMed ID: 9315572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of low osmolality contrast media on electrophysiology and hemodynamics in coronary angiography: differences between an ionic (ioxaglate) and a nonionic (iohexol) agent.
    Vik-Mo H; Følling M; Barth P; Nordrehaug JE; Bjørkhaug A; Rosland GA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Dec; 21(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 2276191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative studies of diatrizoate, ioxaglate and iohexol as angiocardiographic contrast media].
    Esplugas E; Torrents A; Mauri J; Jara F
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1989 Mar; 42(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 2781110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of thrombosis during coronary angioplasty with low osmolality contrast media.
    Esplugas E; Cequier A; Jara F; Mauri J; Soler T; Sala J; Sabate X
    Am J Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 68(10):1020-4. PubMed ID: 1927914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Iohexol, ioxaglate and iopamidol in coronary angiography. A double-blind comparative study of 300 patients.
    Soiva M; Hekali P; Keto P; Karumo J; Salonen O; Heikkilä J
    Australas Radiol; 1991 May; 35(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 1930006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of an ionic versus a nonionic low osmolar contrast agent on the thrombotic complications of coronary angioplasty.
    Piessens JH; Stammen F; Vrolix MC; Glazier JJ; Benit E; De Geest H; Willems JL
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Feb; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 8448808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Renal failure in 57 925 patients undergoing coronary procedures using iso-osmolar or low-osmolar contrast media.
    Liss P; Persson PB; Hansell P; Lagerqvist B
    Kidney Int; 2006 Nov; 70(10):1811-7. PubMed ID: 17003814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography.
    Neiss AC; Barth P; Chastin I; Erdmann E
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iohexol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
    Stiris MG; Laerum F
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(6):767-70. PubMed ID: 2962617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience with low osmolar contrast media a clinical and experimental study.
    Pokorny L; Nagy E; Vadon G
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 2742325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Miscellaneous adverse effects of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media: a study revised.
    Brismar J; Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1826061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iohexol vs. ioxaglate in lower extremity angiography: a comparative randomized double-blind study in 80 patients.
    Krouwels MM; Overbosch EH; Guit GL
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 May; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 8793433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reports on contrast media reactions: analysis of data from reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
    Lasser EC; Lyon SG; Berry CC
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 9169676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate and delayed tolerance of iohexol and ioxaglate in lower limb phlebography: a double-blind comparative study in humans.
    Bertrand P; Delhommais A; Alison D; Rouleau P
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):683-6. PubMed ID: 9419625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ECG changes during cerebral angiography; a comparison of low osmolality contrast media.
    Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Abe M
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1889431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Changes in renal function immediately after the angiography].
    Murakami R; Tajima H; Kumazaki T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jun; 54(7):605-12. PubMed ID: 8065882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.