These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22399004)

  • 1. Sex selection and abortion: a case for legal re-evaluation?
    McHale JV
    Br J Nurs; 2012 Mar 8-21; 21(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 22399004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulating post-implantation fetal sex selection: a UK perspective.
    Newiss H
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):627-30. PubMed ID: 16856228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS.
    Fovargue S; Bennett R
    Med Law Rev; 2016; 24(1):34-58. PubMed ID: 26811500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex-selective abortions: no simple solution.
    Vogel L
    CMAJ; 2012 Feb; 184(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 22271910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex selection migrates to Canada.
    Vogel L
    CMAJ; 2012 Feb; 184(3):E163-4. PubMed ID: 22249984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ESHRE Task Force on ethics and Law 20: sex selection for non-medical reasons.
    Dondorp W; De Wert G; Pennings G; Shenfield F; Devroey P; Tarlatzis B; Barri P; Diedrich K
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1448-54. PubMed ID: 23578946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex selection: regulating technology enabling the predetermination of a child's gender.
    Jones OD
    Harv J Law Technol; 1992; 6(1):1-62. PubMed ID: 16594114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. India's problem with girls.
    Sachan D
    BMJ; 2013 Aug; 347():f4149. PubMed ID: 23990631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public Perceptions of Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.
    Olesen AP; Mohd Nor SN; Amin L; Che Ngah A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1563-1580. PubMed ID: 27995446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gynaecologists' attitude to abortion provision in 2015.
    Savage WD; Francome C
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Apr; 37(3):406-408. PubMed ID: 28129713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concerns of sex selection and regulation in the report on Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.
    Bahadur G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Jul; 11(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 16102278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The current state of abortion law and practice in Northern Ireland.
    Daniels P; Campbell P; Clinton A
    Br J Nurs; 2013 Mar 28-Apr 10; 22(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 23901450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-visioning evidence: Reflections on the recent controversy around gender selective abortion in the UK.
    Unnithan M; Dubuc S
    Glob Public Health; 2018 Jun; 13(6):742-753. PubMed ID: 28705073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The limits of choice.
    Shah C
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2007; 4(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 18630365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are we talking about the butterflies or a butterfly effect? Comment on 'No country is an island'.
    Kahraman S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Jul; 11(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 16102279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "After birth" abortion: a biomedical and conceptual nonsense.
    Benagiano G; Landeweerd L; Brosens I
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jul; 26(11):1053-9. PubMed ID: 23495749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Debating late abortion: time to tell the truth.
    Lee E
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Jan; 31(1):7, 9. PubMed ID: 15720839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consequences of sex selection.
    Rothman BK
    Chron High Educ; 2006 Feb; 52(25):B16. PubMed ID: 16786619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No country is an island: comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Jul; 11(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 16102276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism.
    Menon N
    Can J Women Law; 1993; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.