170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22399053)
1. Is sexual concordance related to awareness of physiological states?
Suschinsky KD; Lalumière ML
Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Feb; 41(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 22399053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between sexual concordance and interoception in anxious and nonanxious women.
Suschinsky KD; Lalumière ML
J Sex Med; 2014 Apr; 11(4):942-955. PubMed ID: 23859298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex differences in patterns of genital sexual arousal: measurement artifacts or true phenomena?
Suschinsky KD; Lalumière ML; Chivers ML
Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Aug; 38(4):559-73. PubMed ID: 18343987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interoception and sexual response in women with low sexual desire.
Velten J; Brotto LA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185979. PubMed ID: 29020067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Habituation of sexual responses in men and women: a test of the preparation hypothesis of women's genital responses.
Dawson SJ; Suschinsky KD; Lalumière ML
J Sex Med; 2013 Apr; 10(4):990-1000. PubMed ID: 23320579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physiological and subjective sexual arousal in self-identified asexual women.
Brotto LA; Yule MA
Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Aug; 40(4):699-712. PubMed ID: 20857185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interoception and Awareness of Physiological Sexual Arousal in Women With Sexual Arousal Concerns.
Handy AB; Meston CM
J Sex Marital Ther; 2018 May; 44(4):398-409. PubMed ID: 29166215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examining gender specificity of sexual response with concurrent thermography and plethysmography.
Huberman JS; Chivers ML
Psychophysiology; 2015 Oct; 52(10):1382-95. PubMed ID: 26153384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gender differences in sexual arousal and affective responses to erotica: the effects of type of film and fantasy instructions.
Carvalho J; Gomes AQ; Laja P; Oliveira C; Vilarinho S; Janssen E; Nobre P
Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Aug; 42(6):1011-9. PubMed ID: 23519591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feederism: an exaggeration of a normative mate selection preference?
Terry LL; Suschinsky KD; Lalumière ML; Vasey PL
Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Feb; 41(1):249-60. PubMed ID: 22392517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Relationship between female sexual arousal and response bias in women with and without provoked vestibulodynia.
Boyer SC; Pukall CF; Holden RR
J Sex Res; 2012; 49(6):519-32. PubMed ID: 21843100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interaction of state and trait aspects of self-focused attention affects genital, but not subjective, sexual arousal in sexually functional women.
van Lankveld J; Bergh S
Behav Res Ther; 2008 Apr; 46(4):514-28. PubMed ID: 18325482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of gender and relationship context in audio narratives on genital and subjective sexual response in heterosexual women and men.
Chivers ML; Timmers AD
Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Feb; 41(1):185-97. PubMed ID: 22406875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ambivalent affect and sexual response: the impact of co-occurring positive and negative emotions on subjective and physiological sexual responses to erotic stimuli.
Peterson ZD; Janssen E
Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Dec; 36(6):793-807. PubMed ID: 17380376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examining the time course of genital and subjective sexual responses in women and men with concurrent plethysmography and thermography.
Huberman JS; Dawson SJ; Chivers ML
Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():359-369. PubMed ID: 28919258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A sex difference in features that elicit genital response.
Chivers ML; Bailey JM
Biol Psychol; 2005 Oct; 70(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 16168255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal.
Chivers ML; Rieger G; Latty E; Bailey JM
Psychol Sci; 2004 Nov; 15(11):736-44. PubMed ID: 15482445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual desire, sexual arousal and hormonal differences in premenopausal US and Dutch women with and without low sexual desire.
Heiman JR; Rupp H; Janssen E; Newhouse SK; Brauer M; Laan E
Horm Behav; 2011 May; 59(5):772-9. PubMed ID: 21514299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of increasing neutral distraction on sexual responding of women with and without sexual problems.
Salemink E; van Lankveld JJ
Arch Sex Behav; 2006 Apr; 35(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 16752120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the Bogus Pipeline Increases Sexual Concordance in Women But Not Men.
Suschinsky KD; Fisher TD; Maunder L; Hollenstein T; Chivers ML
Arch Sex Behav; 2020 Jul; 49(5):1517-1532. PubMed ID: 32504234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
