These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22399221)
1. Measurement of fetal heart rate variability on an electronic monitor using a prototype electronic ruler. Hall LM; Hannon DJ; Leisk GG; Wolfberg AJ; House MD Am J Perinatol; 2012 Jun; 29(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 22399221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making. Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability. Chauhan SP; Klauser CK; Woodring TC; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Morrison JC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):623.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18667185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adaptive filtering in ECG monitoring of the fetal heart rate. Frank TH; Blaumanis OR; Gibbs RK; Wells RK J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():108-13. PubMed ID: 3694088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical application of the expert type terminal of remote electronic fetal heart rate home monitoring system]. Su F; Guo X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 37(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 12411023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver reliability of fetal heart rate pattern interpretation using NICHD definitions. Epstein AJ; Twogood S; Lee RH; Opper N; Beavis A; Miller DA Am J Perinatol; 2013 Jun; 30(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 23161350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System. Blackwell SC; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Gyamfi Bannerman C Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 205(4):378.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21864826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association? Parer JT; King T; Flanders S; Fox M; Kilpatrick SJ J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 16753769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor. Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observations on perinatal heart rate monitoring. II. Quantitative unreliability of Doppler fetal heart rate variability. Suidan JS; Young BK; Hochberg HM; George ME J Reprod Med; 1985 Jul; 30(7):519-22. PubMed ID: 4032387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transabdominal fetal heart rate detection using NIR photopleythysmography: instrumentation and clinical results. Gan KB; Zahedi E; Mohd Ali MA IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Aug; 56(8):2075-82. PubMed ID: 19403354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of strategies for monitoring fetal heart rate in labor. Simpson N; Oppenheimer LW; Siren A; Bland E; McDonald O; McDonald D; Dabrowski A Am J Perinatol; 1999; 16(4):167-73. PubMed ID: 10458528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal heart rate recorder for long-duration use in active full-term pregnant women. Shono H; Muro M; Kohara M; Ito Y; Nagasawa T; Sugimori H Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 8290200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal heart rate monitoring device using condenser microphone sensor: Validation and comparison to standard devices. Ahmad HAB; El-Badawy IM; Singh OP; Hisham RB; Malarvili MB Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):573-579. PubMed ID: 29758955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]