These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22399245)

  • 1. Using the linear mixed model to analyze nonnormal data distributions in longitudinal designs.
    Arnau J; Bono R; Blanca MJ; Bendayan R
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1224-38. PubMed ID: 22399245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of the violation of normality and sphericity in the linear mixed model in split-plot designs].
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2012; 24(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 22748739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of skewness and kurtosis on the robustness of linear mixed models.
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):873-9. PubMed ID: 23299397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should we rely on the Kenward-Roger approximation when using linear mixed models if the groups have different distributions?
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):408-29. PubMed ID: 24028625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of skewness and kurtosis on the Kenward-Roger approximation when group distributions differ.
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2014 May; 26(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 24755032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sphericity estimation bias for repeated measures designs in simulation studies.
    Bono R; Arnau J; Blanca MJ; Alarcón R
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1621-1630. PubMed ID: 26489849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: the case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data.
    Oberfeld D; Franke T
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):792-812. PubMed ID: 23184532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Simple Simulation Technique for Nonnormal Data with Prespecified Skewness, Kurtosis, and Covariance Matrix.
    Foldnes N; Olsson UH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):207-19. PubMed ID: 27014851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups on mixed-effects models for repeated measures.
    Gosho M; Maruo K
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):578-592. PubMed ID: 29978944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
    Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements I: an adjusted sandwich estimator.
    Skene SS; Kenward MG
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2825-37. PubMed ID: 20839367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates.
    Ateş C; Kaymaz Ö; Kale HE; Tekindal MA
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():2173638. PubMed ID: 31396289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of likelihood ratio tests and Rao's score test for three separable covariance matrix structures.
    Filipiak K; Klein D; Roy A
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):192-215. PubMed ID: 27774639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On summary measure analysis of linear trend repeated measures data: performance comparison with two competing methods.
    Vossoughi M; Ayatollahi SM; Towhidi M; Ketabchi F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Mar; 12():33. PubMed ID: 22439982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements II: a modified Box correction.
    Skene SS; Kenward MG
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2838-56. PubMed ID: 20860066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Violation of the Sphericity Assumption and Its Effect on Type-I Error Rates in Repeated Measures ANOVA and Multi-Level Linear Models (MLM).
    Haverkamp N; Beauducel A
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1841. PubMed ID: 29089917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model selection techniques for the covariance matrix for incomplete longitudinal data.
    Grady JJ; Helms RW
    Stat Med; 1995 Jul; 14(13):1397-416. PubMed ID: 7481180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Two Procedures for Analyzing Small Sets of Repeated Measures Data.
    Vallejo G; Livacic-Rojas P
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2005 Apr; 40(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 26760106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of five information criteria to discriminate covariance structures with missing data in repeated measures designs.
    Livacic-Rojas P; Fernández P; Vallejo G; Tuero-Herrero E; Ordóñez F
    Psicothema; 2020 Aug; 32(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 32711676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.