These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22399245)

  • 21. Comparing a single case to a control group - Applying linear mixed effects models to repeated measures data.
    Huber S; Klein E; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():148-59. PubMed ID: 26218619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of single-case experimental count data using the linear mixed effects model: A simulation study.
    Declercq L; Jamshidi L; Fernández-Castilla B; Beretvas SN; Moeyaert M; Ferron JM; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2477-2497. PubMed ID: 30105444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A power approximation for the Kenward and Roger Wald test in the linear mixed model.
    Kreidler SM; Ringham BM; Muller KE; Glueck DH
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254811. PubMed ID: 34288958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gauss or Bernoulli? A Monte Carlo comparison of the performance of the linear mixed-model and the logistic mixed-model analyses in simulated community trials with a dichotomous outcome variable at the individual level.
    Hannan PJ; Murray DM
    Eval Rev; 1996 Jun; 20(3):338-52. PubMed ID: 10182208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Generating Multivariate Ordinal Data via Entropy Principles.
    Lee Y; Kaplan D
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):156-181. PubMed ID: 29359242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scale mixture of skew-normal linear mixed models with within-subject serial dependence.
    Schumacher FL; Lachos VH; Matos LA
    Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(7):1790-1810. PubMed ID: 33438305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robust tests for multivariate factorial designs under heteroscedasticity.
    Vallejo G; Ato M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):471-89. PubMed ID: 21994181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Establishing normative data for repeated cognitive assessment: a comparison of different statistical methods.
    Van der Elst W; Molenberghs G; Van Boxtel MP; Jolles J
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):1073-86. PubMed ID: 23344738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
    Chen X; Wei L
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Approximations to the distribution of a test statistic in covariance structure analysis: A comprehensive study.
    Wu H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):334-362. PubMed ID: 29086416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modeling the random effects covariance matrix for longitudinal data with covariates measurement error.
    Hoque ME; Torabi M
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4167-4184. PubMed ID: 30039601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):399-417. PubMed ID: 22563845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian inference for two-part mixed-effects model using skew distributions, with application to longitudinal semicontinuous alcohol data.
    Xing D; Huang Y; Chen H; Zhu Y; Dagne GA; Baldwin J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1838-1853. PubMed ID: 26092477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Monte Carlo investigation of the Fisher Z transformation for normal and nonnormal distributions.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1101-14. PubMed ID: 11272750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bayesian information criterion for longitudinal and clustered data.
    Jones RH
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3050-6. PubMed ID: 21805487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: the utility of multilevel modeling approaches.
    Ferron JM; Bell BA; Hess MR; Rendina-Gobioff G; Hibbard ST
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):372-84. PubMed ID: 19363177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A cautionary tale on the effects of different covariance structures in linear mixed effects modeling of fMRI data.
    van der Horn HJ; Erhardt EB; Dodd AB; Nathaniel U; Wick TV; McQuaid JR; Ryman SG; Vakhtin AA; Meier TB; Mayer AR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 May; 45(7):e26699. PubMed ID: 38726907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the solution multiplicity of the Fleishman method and its impact in simulation studies.
    Olvera Astivia OL; Zumbo BD
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):437-458. PubMed ID: 29323414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.