BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22399327)

  • 1. The use of telephone in genetic counseling versus in-person counseling: a randomized study on counselees' outcome.
    Platten U; Rantala J; Lindblom A; Brandberg Y; Lindgren G; Arver B
    Fam Cancer; 2012 Sep; 11(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 22399327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does enhanced information at cancer genetic counseling improve counselees' knowledge, risk perception, satisfaction and negotiation of information to at-risk relatives?--a randomized study.
    Roshanai AH; Rosenquist R; Lampic C; Nordin K
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(7):999-1009. PubMed ID: 19636983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial cancer genetic counseling consultation: change in counselees' cognitions and anxiety, and association with addressing their needs and preferences.
    Pieterse AH; Ausems MG; Van Dulmen AM; Beemer FA; Bensing JM
    Am J Med Genet A; 2005 Aug; 137(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 16007615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.
    Albada A; van Dulmen S; Lindhout D; Bensing JM; Ausems MG
    Fam Cancer; 2012 Mar; 11(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 21901499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of counselee and counselor satisfaction in reproductive genetic counseling.
    Aalfs CM; Oort FJ; de Haes JC; Leschot NJ; Smets EM
    Clin Genet; 2007 Aug; 72(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 17661810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
    Schwartz MD; Valdimarsdottir HB; Peshkin BN; Mandelblatt J; Nusbaum R; Huang AT; Chang Y; Graves K; Isaacs C; Wood M; McKinnon W; Garber J; McCormick S; Kinney AY; Luta G; Kelleher S; Leventhal KG; Vegella P; Tong A; King L
    J Clin Oncol; 2014 Mar; 32(7):618-26. PubMed ID: 24449235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The efficacy of a standardized questionnaire in facilitating personalized communication about problems encountered in cancer genetic counseling: design of a randomized controlled trial.
    Eijzenga W; Aaronson NK; Kluijt I; Sidharta GN; Hahn DE; Ausems MG; Bleiker EM
    BMC Cancer; 2014 Jan; 14():26. PubMed ID: 24428912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to support cancer genetics counselees in informing at-risk relatives? Lessons from a randomized controlled trial.
    Eijzenga W; de Geus E; Aalfs CM; Menko FH; Sijmons RH; de Haes HCJM; Smets EMA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Sep; 101(9):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 29789176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.
    Jacobs AS; Schwartz MD; Valdimarsdottir H; Nusbaum RH; Hooker GW; DeMarco TA; Heinzmann JE; McKinnon W; McCormick SR; Davis C; Forman AD; Lebensohn AP; Dalton E; Tully DM; Graves KD; Similuk M; Kelly S; Peshkin BN
    Fam Cancer; 2016 Oct; 15(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 26969308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up effects of a tailored pre-counseling website with question prompt in breast cancer genetic counseling.
    Albada A; van Dulmen S; Spreeuwenberg P; Ausems MG
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Jan; 98(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 25455796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychosocial outcomes and counselee satisfaction following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: A patient-reported outcome study.
    Oberguggenberger A; Sztankay M; Morscher RJ; Sperner-Unterweger B; Weber I; Hubalek M; Kemmler G; Zschocke J; Martini C; Egle D; Dünser M; Gamper E; Meraner V
    J Psychosom Res; 2016 Oct; 89():39-45. PubMed ID: 27663109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Counselees' Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence.
    Albada A; van Dulmen S; Dijkstra H; Wieffer I; Witkamp A; Ausems MG
    J Genet Couns; 2016 Apr; 25(2):279-89. PubMed ID: 26321750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Permanence of the information given during oncogenetic counseling to persons at familial risk of breast/ovarian and/or colon cancer.
    Kwiatkowski F; Dessenne P; Laquet C; Petit MF; Bignon YJ
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2012 Feb; 20(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 21934710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial.
    Albada A; van Dulmen S; Bensing JM; Ausems MG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Mar; 14(2):R37. PubMed ID: 22394647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine assessment of psychosocial problems after cancer genetic counseling: results from a randomized controlled trial.
    Eijzenga W; Bleiker EM; Ausems MG; Sidharta GN; Van der Kolk LE; Velthuizen ME; Hahn DE; Aaronson NK
    Clin Genet; 2015 May; 87(5):419-27. PubMed ID: 25130962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Counselees' Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study.
    Sweet K; Hovick S; Sturm AC; Schmidlen T; Gordon E; Bernhardt B; Wawak L; Wernke K; McElroy J; Scheinfeldt L; Toland AE; Roberts JS; Christman M
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Aug; 26(4):738-751. PubMed ID: 27921197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial.
    Kinney AY; Butler KM; Schwartz MD; Mandelblatt JS; Boucher KM; Pappas LM; Gammon A; Kohlmann W; Edwards SL; Stroup AM; Buys SS; Flores KG; Campo RA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Dec; 106(12):. PubMed ID: 25376862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized experimental study to test the effects of discussing uncertainty during cancer genetic counseling: different strategies, different outcomes?
    Medendorp NM; Hillen MA; Visser LNC; Aalfs CM; Duijkers FAM; van Engelen K; Ausems MGEM; Verhoef S; Stiggelbout AM; Smets EMA
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 29(5):789-799. PubMed ID: 33437034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance.
    Buchanan AH; Datta SK; Skinner CS; Hollowell GP; Beresford HF; Freeland T; Rogers B; Boling J; Marcom PK; Adams MB
    J Genet Couns; 2015 Dec; 24(6):961-70. PubMed ID: 25833335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and Feasibility of an Intervention to Support Cancer Genetic Counselees in Informing their At-Risk Relatives.
    de Geus E; Eijzenga W; Menko FH; Sijmons RH; de Haes HC; Aalfs CM; Smets EM
    J Genet Couns; 2016 Dec; 25(6):1179-1187. PubMed ID: 27103421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.