These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22399414)

  • 1. Witnesses in action: the effect of physical exertion on recall and recognition.
    Hope L; Lewinski W; Dixon J; Blocksidge D; Gabbert F
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Apr; 23(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 22399414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stress induced by a simulated shooting on recall by police and citizen witnesses.
    Stanny CJ; Johnson TC
    Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(3):359-86. PubMed ID: 10997233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Memory and the operational witness: Police officer recall of firearms encounters as a function of active response role.
    Hope L; Blocksidge D; Gabbert F; Sauer JD; Lewinski W; Mirashi A; Atuk E
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 26436335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consistency across repeated eyewitness interviews: contrasting police detectives' beliefs with actual eyewitness performance.
    Krix AC; Sauerland M; Lorei C; Rispens I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118641. PubMed ID: 25695428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy.
    Lindsay RC; Semmler C; Weber N; Brewer N; Lindsay MR
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 18253819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
    Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The emotional eyewitness: the effects of emotion on specific aspects of eyewitness recall and recognition performance.
    Houston KA; Clifford BR; Phillips LH; Memon A
    Emotion; 2013 Feb; 13(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 22775133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of arousal on memory for emotionally-relevant information: a study of skydivers.
    Cavenett T; Nixon RD
    Behav Res Ther; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 16343419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating investigators: examining witnesses' influence on investigators.
    Dahl LC; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):707-32. PubMed ID: 16741634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
    Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clarification of the memory artefact in the assessment of suggestibility.
    Willner P
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Apr; 52(Pt 4):318-26. PubMed ID: 18339094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure.
    Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition memory for valenced and arousing materials under conditions of divided attention.
    Clark-Foos A; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2008; 16(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 18569681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
    Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of post-identification feedback, delay, and suspicion on accurate eyewitnesses.
    Quinlivan DS; Neuschatz JS; Douglass AB; Wells GL; Wetmore SA
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 22667810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.