144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22399843)
41. A comparative study of the effect of fibrin glue versus sutures on clinical outcome in patients undergoing pterygium excision and conjunctival autografts.
Cha DM; Kim KH; Choi HJ; Kim MK; Wee WR
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2012 Dec; 26(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 23204794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of transverse conjunctival advancement flap surgery for primary pterygium.
Park J; Son Y; Suh E
Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 51(6):401-407. PubMed ID: 27938948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Pterygium surgery using inferior rotational conjunctival autograft versus conventional conjunctival autograft with sutures - A comparative study.
Gudimetla J; Potti S; Shivaprasad S; Bhide M; Prabhakar V
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 71(12):3646-3651. PubMed ID: 37991298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Combined "symmetrical conjunctival flap transposition" and intraoperative low-dose mitomycin C in the treatment of primary pterygium.
Uçakhan OO; Kanpolat A
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 34(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 16671901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of the recurrence rate for pterygium treated with conjunctival autograft.
Kocamis O; Bilgec M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 252(5):817-20. PubMed ID: 24509650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Optimal size of pterygium excision for limbal conjunctival autograft using fibrin glue in primary pterygia.
Hwang HS; Cho KJ; Rand G; Chuck RS; Kwon JW
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):135. PubMed ID: 29879926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A comparative study of tissue glue and vicryl suture for closing limbal-conjunctival autografts and histologic evaluation after pterygium excision.
Ozdamar Y; Mutevelli S; Han U; Ileri D; Onal B; Ilhan O; Karakaya J; Zilelioglu O
Cornea; 2008 Jun; 27(5):552-8. PubMed ID: 18520504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery (CAGE CUP): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.
Lešin M; Paradžik M; Marin Lovrić J; Olujić I; Ljubić Ž; Vučinović A; Bućan K; Puljak L
BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e020714. PubMed ID: 29950464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Sutureless and Glue-free Versus Sutures for Limbal Conjunctival Autografting in Primary Pterygium Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Sharma A; Raj H; Gupta A; Raina AV
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Nov; 9(11):NC06-9. PubMed ID: 26675383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Long-term results of bare sclera, limbal-conjunctival autograft and amniotic membrane graft techniques in primary pterygium excisions.
Ozer A; Yildirim N; Erol N; Yurdakul S
Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 19339811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application
Wagdy FM; Farahat HG; Ellakwa AF; Mandour SS
J Ophthalmol; 2021; 2021():8820926. PubMed ID: 33505715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Analysis of variation in success rates in conjunctival autografting for primary and recurrent pterygium.
Ti SE; Chee SP; Dear KB; Tan DT
Br J Ophthalmol; 2000 Apr; 84(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 10729295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Efficacy and Safety of a Large Conjunctival Autograft for Recurrent Pterygium.
Lee JS; Ha SW; Yu S; Lee GJ; Park YJ
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):469-478. PubMed ID: 29230976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Randomized trial of pterygium surgery with mitomycin C application using conjunctival autograft versus conjunctival-limbal autograft.
Kheirkhah A; Hashemi H; Adelpour M; Nikdel M; Rajabi MB; Behrouz MJ
Ophthalmology; 2012 Feb; 119(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 22153864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. 22 Renewal of conjunctival epithelium over amniotic membrane to perform autologous simple conjunctival epithelial transplantation (SCET): in vitro validation and results of clinical application for primary pterygium.
Bertolin M; Pedrotti E; Bonacci E; Bosello F; Barbaro V; Breda C; Ponzin D; Marchini G; Fasolo A
BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 7(Suppl 2):A9-A10. PubMed ID: 37282694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of Keratometric Change Following Various Conjunctival Autografting Techniques in Pterygium Surgery.
Sen S; Jain A; Upadhyay P; Imchen MT; Nath T; Kakkar A
Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49662. PubMed ID: 38161826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Risk factors for pterygium recurrence after limbal-conjunctival autografting: a retrospective, single-centre investigation.
Aidenloo NS; Motarjemizadeh Q; Heidarpanah M
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 62(3):349-356. PubMed ID: 29549462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Conjunctival rotation autograft for primary pterygium.
Alp BN; Yanyali A; Ay GM; Keskin O
Ophthalmologica; 2002; 216(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 12424398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Results of autografting of marginal conjunctiva in pterygium excision.
Ozer A; Yildirim N; Erol N; Yurdakul S
Ophthalmologica; 2002; 216(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 12065857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of autologous fibrin glue versus nylon sutures for securing conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery.
Alamdari DH; Sedaghat MR; Alizadeh R; Zarei-Ghanavati S; Naseri H; Sharifi F
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):1219-1224. PubMed ID: 28624862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
