307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22402015)
1. Development of an adaptive low-pass filtered speech test for the identification of auditory processing disorders.
O'Beirne GA; McGaffin AJ; Rickard NA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 22402015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of auditory processing disorder in children using an adaptive filtered speech test.
Rickard NA; Heidtke UJ; O'Beirne GA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):687-97. PubMed ID: 23879742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory processing disorder and speech perception problems in noise: finding the underlying origin.
Lagacé J; Jutras B; Gagné JP
Am J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 19(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 20308289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dichotic listening performance in young adults using low-pass filtered speech.
Martin JS; Gibson KY; Huston LC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 22436117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Normative data for diagnosing auditory processing disorder in Norwegian children aged 7-12 years.
Mattsson TS; Follestad T; Andersson S; Lind O; Øygarden J; Nordgård S
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 28835140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) performance of individuals with central auditory processing disorders from 5 to 25 years of age.
Dias KZ; Jutras B; Acrani IO; Pereira LD
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 76(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22192900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory processing after sport-related concussions.
Turgeon C; Champoux F; Lepore F; Leclerc S; Ellemberg D
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 21399499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Odds of demonstrating auditory processing abnormality in the average older adult: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study.
Golding M; Taylor A; Cupples L; Mitchell P
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 16518141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory-cognitive interactions underlying interaural asymmetry in an adult listener: a case study.
Davis T; Martin J; Jerger J; Greenwald R; Mehta J
Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21999567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of a screening test and screening checklist for auditory processing disorders.
Yathiraj A; Maggu AR
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 77(6):990-5. PubMed ID: 23608190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China.
Chen J; Zhang H; Plyler PN; Cao W; Chen J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: age effects.
Lister JJ; Roberts RA; Lister FL
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 21299377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
