126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22402392)
1. A comparison of three commercial IMRT treatment planning systems for selected paediatric cases.
Eldesoky I; Attalla EM; Elshemey WM; Zaghloul MS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 13(2):3742. PubMed ID: 22402392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the KonRad IMRT and XiO treatment planning systems.
Reitz B; Miften M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 9(3):122-135. PubMed ID: 18716590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of head and neck cancer.
Bertelsen A; Hansen CR; Johansen J; Brink C
Radiother Oncol; 2010 May; 95(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20188427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].
Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Compensator-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy.
Javedan K; Stevens CW; Forster KM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 9(4):98-109. PubMed ID: 19020484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: a dosimetric and treatment efficiency comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Ma Y; Li M; Yin Y; Kong L; Sun X; Lin X; Yu J
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Oct; 9(5):499-507. PubMed ID: 20815421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dependence of achievable plan quality on treatment technique and planning goal refinement: a head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy application.
Qi XS; Ruan D; Lee SP; Pham A; Kupelian P; Low DA; Steinberg M; Demarco J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 25752396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Wang S; Ai P; Xie L; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Li P; Chen N
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24099965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.
Kantz S; Söhn M; Troeller A; Reiner M; Weingandt H; Alber M; Belka C; Ganswindt U
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Sep; 10():184. PubMed ID: 26328628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of direct aperture optimization on plan quality and efficiency in complex head and neck IMRT.
Sabatino M; Kretschmer M; Zink K; Würschmidt F
Radiat Oncol; 2012 Jan; 7():7. PubMed ID: 22269088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereotactic intensity modulated radiation therapy and inverse treatment planning for tumors of the head and neck region: clinical implementation of the step and shoot approach and first clinical results.
Münter MW; Thilmann C; Hof H; Didinger B; Rhein B; Nill S; Schlegel W; Wannenmacher M; Debus J
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Mar; 66(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 12742271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
