These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2240251)

  • 1. Nature of defibrillation: determinism versus probabilism.
    Deale OC; Wesley RC; Morgan D; Lerman BB
    Am J Physiol; 1990 Nov; 259(5 Pt 2):H1544-50. PubMed ID: 2240251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defibrillation efficacy. Comparison of defibrillation threshold versus dose-response curve determination.
    Jones DL; Irish WD; Klein GJ
    Circ Res; 1991 Jul; 69(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2054941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A percutaneous catheter-based system for the measurement of potential gradients applicable to the study of transthoracic defibrillation.
    Rosborough JP; Deno DC; Walker RG; Niemann JT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 17338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the parameter distributions of defibrillation shock efficacy curves in a large population.
    Smits K; Virag N
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1314-25. PubMed ID: 20069370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of shock separation time on multiple-shock defibrillation.
    Moore TW; DiMeo FN; Dubin SE
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 634187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ventricular defibrillating threshold: strength-duration and percent-success curves.
    Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Babbs CF; Bourland JD
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1997 Jul; 35(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 9327602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.
    Lerman BB; Halperin HR; Tsitlik JE; Brin K; Clark CW; Deale OC
    J Clin Invest; 1987 Sep; 80(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 3624489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the efficacy of defibrillation with the damped sine and constant-tilt current waveforms in the intact animal.
    Hinds M; Ayers GM; Bourland JD; Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Fearnot N
    Med Instrum; 1987 Apr; 21(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 3614037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Atrial defibrillation using temporary epicardial defibrillation stainless steel wire electrodes: studies in the canine sterile pericarditis model.
    Ortiz J; Sokoloski MC; Ayers GM; Cmolik BL; Niwano S; Geha AS; Waldo AL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 26(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 7594054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal stability and precision of ventricular defibrillation threshold data.
    Babbs CF; Whistler SJ; Yim GK
    Am J Physiol; 1978 Nov; 235(5):H553-8. PubMed ID: 31797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of transthoracic square-wave defibrillation experience in the dog and calf.
    Gold JH; Schuder JC; Stoeckle H; Granberg TA; Hamdani SZ; Rychlewski JM
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 634184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Optimization of electrode location and size on simulation in electric field distribution of atrial defibrillation].
    Wang C; Yang S; Zheng Y; Wu X; Wang Q; Wei D
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 38(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 24941768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element analysis of cardiac defibrillation current distributions.
    Sepulveda NG; Wikswo JP; Echt DS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Apr; 37(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 2338348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transmyocardial impedance during single and multiple internal ventricular defibrillation shocks.
    Peters W; Solingen S; Kobayashi Y; Scharf R; Mandel WJ; Gang ES
    Am J Physiol; 1994 Aug; 267(2 Pt 2):H684-93. PubMed ID: 8067424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vector magnitude using orthogonal ECG leads during ventricular fibrillation is associated with defibrillation outcome.
    Gurunathan S; Hsia PW; Lawton J; Hua DP
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 9475962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of acute coronary artery occlusion on direct ventricular defibrillation in dogs.
    Ruffy R; Schwartz DJ; Hieb BR
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 7354732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting the potential gradient field in ventricular fibrillation from shocks delivered in paced rhythm.
    Idriss SF; Melnick SB; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1995 Jun; 268(6 Pt 2):H2336-44. PubMed ID: 7611485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate termination of fibrillation at 50% probability of overall success correlates with defibrillation dose-response curve width.
    Tovar OH; Snyder DE; Jones JL
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 15(10):1207-11. PubMed ID: 15485449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.