350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22403080)
1. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
The JS; Schilling KJ; Hoffmeister JW; Friedmann E; McGinnis R; Holcomb RG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Kim SY; Chang JM; Kim SM; Cho N
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20429765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: false-positive marks and their reproducibility in negative mammograms.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Seong MH; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):999-1004. PubMed ID: 19863409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Features of prospectively overlooked computer-aided detection marks on prior screening digital mammograms in women with breast cancer.
Cho N; Kim SJ; Choi HY; Lyou CY; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1276-82. PubMed ID: 20966340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities.
Ho WT; Lam PW
Clin Radiol; 2003 Feb; 58(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 12623042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of breast density on computer aided detection.
Malich A; Fischer DR; Facius M; Petrovitch A; Boettcher J; Marx C; Hansch A; Kaiser WA
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Sep; 18(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 15827823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Malignant lesions on mammography: accuracy of two different computer-aided detection systems.
Lobbes M; Smidt M; Keymeulen K; Girometti R; Zuiani C; Beets-Tan R; Wildberger J; Boetes C
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 23465980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted detection as a second reader in symptomatic Asian women with palpable breast cancer.
Chu WC; Lam WW; Pang AL; So NM; Tang AP; Tse GM; Ahuja AT
Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 15191097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting the rate of false positive marks in CAD in full-field digital mammography.
Engelken F; Bremme R; Bick U; Hammann-Kloss S; Fallenberg EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e844-8. PubMed ID: 22647420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.
Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
