These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22403450)

  • 1. Evaluation of a self-instruction package for conducting stimulus preference assessments.
    Graff RB; Karsten AM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 22403450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments.
    Roscoe EM; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 18595289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preference assessment training via self-instruction: A replication and extension.
    Shapiro M; Kazemi E; Pogosjana M; Rios D; Mendoza M
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Dec; 49(4):794-808. PubMed ID: 27529830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing accurate preference assessment implementation through pyramidal training.
    Pence ST; St Peter CC; Tetreault AS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 22844141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training staff to implement brief stimulus preference assessments.
    Weldy CR; Rapp JT; Capocasa K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):214-8. PubMed ID: 24452818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Further evaluation of a brief, intensive teacher-training model.
    Lerman DC; Tetreault A; Hovanetz A; Strobel M; Garro J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18595288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of video self-instruction for implementing paired-stimulus preference assessments.
    Hansard C; Kazemi E
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jul; 51(3):675-680. PubMed ID: 29770437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a telehealth training package to remotely train staff to conduct a preference assessment.
    Higgins WJ; Luczynski KC; Carroll RA; Fisher WW; Mudford OC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Apr; 50(2):238-251. PubMed ID: 28090644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of video modeling with embedded instructions to teach implementation of stimulus preference assessments.
    Rosales R; Gongola L; Homlitas C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 25927112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.
    Francisco MT; Borrero JC; Sy JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 18595283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment.
    Lavie T; Sturmey P
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 12102143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of interactive computer training to teach instructors to implement discrete trials with children with autism.
    Pollard JS; Higbee TS; Akers JS; Brodhead MT
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(4):765-76. PubMed ID: 25124298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elimination of position-biased responding in individuals with autism and intellectual disabilities.
    Bourret JC; Iwata BA; Harper JM; North ST
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(2):241-50. PubMed ID: 22844134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of behavioral skills training on instructor and learner behavior across responses and skill sets.
    Fetherston AM; Sturmey P
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Feb; 35(2):541-62. PubMed ID: 24374896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of training and feedback on Discrete Trial Teaching skills and student performance.
    Downs A; Downs RC; Rau K
    Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 17582740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a self-instructional manual for conducting discrete-trials teaching with children with autism.
    Thiessen C; Fazzio D; Arnal L; Martin GL; Yu CT; Keilback L
    Behav Modif; 2009 May; 33(3):360-73. PubMed ID: 19139527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pyramidal staff training in the extension of treatment for severe behavior disorders.
    Shore BA; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Lerman DC; Zarcone JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 7592148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training residential supervisors to provide feedback for maintaining staff teaching skills with people who have severe disabilities.
    Parsons MB; Reid DH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 7592147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Various High-Probability to Low-Probability Instruction Ratios During the Use of the High-Probability Instructional Sequence.
    Ertel H; Wilder DA; Hodges A; Hurtado L
    Behav Modif; 2019 Sep; 43(5):639-655. PubMed ID: 29902925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.