225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22403538)
1. Tracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluation.
Hartshorne JK; Schachner A
Front Comput Neurosci; 2012; 6():8. PubMed ID: 22403538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
Nielsen MB; Seitz K
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Growth of Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Orthopaedic Journals.
Kortlever JTP; Tran TTH; Ring D; Menendez ME
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jul; 477(7):1727-1735. PubMed ID: 31135548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?-a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology.
O'Kelly F; Fernandez N; Koyle MA
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Apr; 15(2):159.e1-159.e7. PubMed ID: 30867116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Citation indexing and evaluation of scientific papers.
Margolis J
Science; 1967 Mar; 155(3767):1213-9. PubMed ID: 5335153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
Colombini D; Occhipinti E
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Journal Standards - Editor's reply.
Jolly PD
N Z Vet J; 2003 Aug; 51(4):199. PubMed ID: 16032326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals.
Callaham M; Wears RL; Weber E
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2847-50. PubMed ID: 12038930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
Jones AW
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of citations of open access and non-open access conservation biology journal papers and book chapters.
Calver MC; Bradley JS
Conserv Biol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):872-80. PubMed ID: 20455909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bibliometric analysis of case report citations and their effect on the impact factor: How does publishing case reports impact journals?
Erivan R; Dartus J; Villatte G; Marcheix PS; Descamps S; Boisgard S
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1463-1467. PubMed ID: 33289655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
Verbitskaya EV
Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientometric analysis of anthropology in the Republic of Croatia for the period of 1980-1996.
Bencetic Klaić Z; Klaić B
Coll Antropol; 1997 Jun; 21(1):301-18. PubMed ID: 9225525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact factor and other indices to assess science, scientists and scientific journals.
Satyanarayana K
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010; 54(3):197-212. PubMed ID: 21409860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.
Suzuki K; Edelson A; Iversen LL; Hausmann L; Schulz JB; Turner AJ
J Neurochem; 2016 Oct; 139 Suppl 2():17-23. PubMed ID: 27534728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project.
Cortegiani A; Ippolito M; Ingoglia G; Manca A; Cugusi L; Severin A; Strinzel M; Panzarella V; Campisi G; Manoj L; Gregoretti C; Einav S; Moher D; Giarratano A
F1000Res; 2020; 9():415. PubMed ID: 33024548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science.
Kriegeskorte N
Front Comput Neurosci; 2012; 6():79. PubMed ID: 23087639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is Psychological Science Self-Correcting? Citations Before and After Successful and Failed Replications.
von Hippel PT
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Nov; 17(6):1556-1565. PubMed ID: 35713980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of Citation Patterns and Impact of Predatory Sources in the Nursing Literature.
Oermann MH; Nicoll LH; Ashton KS; Edie AH; Amarasekara S; Chinn PL; Carter-Templeton H; Ledbetter LS
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2020 May; 52(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 32346979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
