91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22404032)
1. [Research on operating characteristics of multiclass receiver in machine learning].
Li J; Wang J; Hang W
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 29(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 22404032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficient multiclass ROC approximation by decomposition via confusion matrix perturbation analysis.
Landgrebe TC; Duin RP
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 May; 30(5):810-22. PubMed ID: 18369251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classifier ensemble construction with rotation forest to improve medical diagnosis performance of machine learning algorithms.
Ozcift A; Gulten A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Dec; 104(3):443-51. PubMed ID: 21531475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selection and combination of machine learning classifiers for prediction of linear B-cell epitopes on proteins.
Söllner J
J Mol Recognit; 2006; 19(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 16602136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis.
Chan K; Lee TW; Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 12214886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On linear combinations of dichotomizers for maximizing the area under the ROC curve.
Marrocco C; Molinara M; Tortorella F
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2011 Jun; 41(3):610-20. PubMed ID: 20805055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multiclass classification method based on decoding of binary classifiers.
Takenouchi T; Ishii S
Neural Comput; 2009 Jul; 21(7):2049-81. PubMed ID: 19292646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of EEG signals by combining eigenvector methods and multiclass support vector machines.
Derya Ubeyli E
Comput Biol Med; 2008 Jan; 38(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 17651716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of irregular and unbalanced data to predict diabetic nephropathy using visualization and feature selection methods.
Cho BH; Yu H; Kim KW; Kim TH; Kim IY; Kim SI
Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jan; 42(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 17997291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Generating ROC curves for artificial neural networks.
Woods K; Bowyer KW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Jun; 16(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 9184895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indexes for three-class classification performance assessment--an empirical comparison.
Sampat MP; Patel AC; Wang Y; Gupta S; Kan CW; Bovik AC; Markey MK
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 May; 13(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 19171528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ROC-based assessments of 3D cortical surface-matching algorithms.
Bansal R; Staib LH; Whiteman R; Wang YM; Peterson BS
Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):150-62. PubMed ID: 15588606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An extension of the receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC-optimal classification.
Takenouchi T; Komori O; Eguchi S
Neural Comput; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2789-824. PubMed ID: 22734493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
Metz CE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ROC-based utility function maximization for feature selection and classification with applications to high-dimensional protease data.
Liu Z; Tan M
Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1155-61. PubMed ID: 18363775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiobjective genetic optimization of diagnostic classifiers with implications for generating receiver operating characteristic curves.
Kupinski MA; Anastasio MA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Aug; 18(8):675-85. PubMed ID: 10534050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing classifiers from two independent data sets using ROC analysis: a nonparametric approach.
Yousef WA; Wagner RF; Loew MH
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Nov; 28(11):1809-17. PubMed ID: 17063685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The validity of three-class Hotelling trace (3-HT) in describing three-class task performance: comparison of three-class volume under ROC surface (VUS) and 3-HT.
He X; Frey EC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Feb; 28(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 19188107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SVMs modeling for highly imbalanced classification.
Tang Y; Zhang YQ; Chawla NV; Krasser S
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2009 Feb; 39(1):281-8. PubMed ID: 19068445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images.
Juntu J; Sijbers J; De Backer S; Rajan J; Van Dyck D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):680-9. PubMed ID: 20187212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
