150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22404196)
1. No skin reactions to mineral powders in nickel-sensitive subjects.
Lodén M; Nilsson G; Parvardeh M; Neimert Carne K; Berg M
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 22404196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance.
Färm G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1998; 201():1-42. PubMed ID: 9833065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reactivity to euro coins and sensitization thresholds in nickel-sensitive subjects.
Seidenari S; Giusti F; Pellacani G; Antelmi AR; Foti C; Bonamonte D; Ayala F; Balato G; Cristaudo A; Stingeni L; Lisi P
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15987291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can the reporting of adverse skin reactions to cosmetics be improved? A prospective clinical study using a structured protocol.
Berne B; Tammela M; Färm G; Inerot A; Lindberg M
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Apr; 58(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 18353030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nickel and cobalt allergy before and after nickel regulation--evaluation of a public health intervention.
Thyssen JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Sep; 65 Suppl 1():1-68. PubMed ID: 21777241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No association between nickel allergy and reporting cosmetic dermatitis from mascara or eye shadow: a cross-sectional general population study.
Thyssen JP; Linneberg A; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Johansen JD
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Jun; 24(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 19929935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can a positive photopatch test be elicited by subclinical irritancy or allergy plus suberythemal UV exposure?
Beattie PE; Traynor NJ; Woods JA; Dawe RS; Ferguson J; Ibbotson SH
Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):235-40. PubMed ID: 15606647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical expression of nickel contact dermatitis primed by diagnostic patch test.
Theler B; Bucher C; French LE; Ballmer Weber B; Hofbauer GF
Dermatology; 2009; 219(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 19349696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 17634081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nickel skin levels in different occupations and an estimate of the threshold for reacting to a single open application of nickel in nickel-allergic subjects.
Gawkrodger DJ; McLeod CW; Dobson K
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Jan; 166(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 21929529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital.
Disphanurat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S7-14. PubMed ID: 21294394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dicaprylyl maleate--an emerging cosmetic allergen.
Lotery H; Kirk S; Beck M; Burova E; Crone M; Curley R; Downs A; Hill G; Horne H; Iftikhar N; Lovell C; Malanin K; Orton D; Powell S; Sansom J; Sonnex T; Todd D; Tucker S; Wilkinson M; Haworth A
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Sep; 57(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 17680866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nickel-containing alloys and platings and their ability to cause dermatitis.
Lidén C; Menné T; Burrows D
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Feb; 134(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 8746329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Contact dermatitis to permanent make up: manifestation of a pre-existing nickel allergy].
Jäger C; Jappe U
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2005 Jul; 3(7):527-9. PubMed ID: 15967013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allergic contact dermatitis due to nickel: descriptive study in a tertiary hospital, 2000-2010.
García-Rabasco AE; Zaragozá-Ninet V; García-Ruíz R; de la Cuadra-Oyanguren J
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2014; 105(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 24530124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in methyldibromo glutaronitrile-sensitive patients.
Schnuch A; Kelterer D; Bauer A; Schuster Ch; Aberer W; Mahler V; Katzer K; Rakoski J; Jappe U; Krautheim A; Bircher A; Koch P; Worm M; Löffler H; Hillen U; Frosch PJ; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 15859992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
