156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22404379)
1. Don't be afraid of irrelevant words: the emotional Stroop effect is confined to attended words.
Frings C; Wühr P
Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(6):1056-68. PubMed ID: 22404379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Stroop effect for spatial orientation.
Wühr P
J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jul; 134(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 17824399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When emotion does and does not impair performance: a Garner theory of the emotional Stroop effect.
Mama Y; Ben-Haim MS; Algom D
Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(4):589-602. PubMed ID: 23025518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
Wühr P; Frings C
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: an ERP study.
Gootjes L; Coppens LC; Zwaan RA; Franken IH; Van Strien JW
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Mar; 79(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 21156188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emotional Stroop Dilution: The boundary conditions of attentional capture by threat words.
Reynolds MG; Langerak RM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():108-15. PubMed ID: 26093219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
Roelofs A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments.
Larsen RJ; Mercer KA; Balota DA
Emotion; 2006 Feb; 6(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 16637750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attending to the distractor and old/new discriminations in negative priming.
Healy D; Burt JS
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):421-43. PubMed ID: 12745842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Better safe than sorry: simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention.
Forbes SJ; Purkis HM; Lipp OV
Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):794-804. PubMed ID: 21824021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Task relevance modulates processing of distracting emotional stimuli.
Lichtenstein-Vidne L; Henik A; Safadi Z
Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21598126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo Stroop paradigm.
MacKay DG; Ahmetzanov MV
Psychol Sci; 2005 Jan; 16(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 15660848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The lateralized emotional stroop task: left visual field interference in women.
Van Strien JW; Valstar LH
Emotion; 2004 Dec; 4(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 15571438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attachment anxiety and attentional control predict immediate and delayed emotional Stroop interference.
Bailey HN; Paret L; Battista C; Xue Y
Emotion; 2012 Apr; 12(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 22468618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The emotional counting Stroop: a task for assessing emotional interference during brain imaging.
Whalen PJ; Bush G; Shin LM; Rauch SL
Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(1):293-6. PubMed ID: 17406247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
Roelofs A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: a combined behavioral and psychophysiological study.
Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Dec; 132(4):512-29. PubMed ID: 14640845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
