These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22405685)

  • 41. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of the cervical spine: how many slices do you need?
    Brown CV; Foulkrod KH; Reifsnyder A; Bui E; Lopez I; Hummell M; Coopwood B
    Am Surg; 2010 Apr; 76(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 20420244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Role of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of cervical spine trauma.
    Gonzalez-Beicos A; Nunez DB
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2009 Jun; 30(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 19537047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of the Canadian C-Spine rule and NEXUS decision instrument in evaluating blunt trauma patients for cervical spine injury.
    Mower WR; Hoffman J
    Ann Emerg Med; 2004 Apr; 43(4):515-7. PubMed ID: 15039696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Canadian Cervical Spine rule compared with computed tomography: a prospective analysis.
    Duane TM; Wilson SP; Mayglothling J; Wolfe LG; Aboutanos MB; Whelan JF; Malhotra AK; Ivatury RR
    J Trauma; 2011 Aug; 71(2):352-5; discussion 355-7. PubMed ID: 21825938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Flexion and extension views are not cost-effective in a cervical spine clearance protocol for obtunded trauma patients.
    Anglen J; Metzler M; Bunn P; Griffiths H
    J Trauma; 2002 Jan; 52(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 11791052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Protocol-driven radiologic evaluation of suspected cervical spine injury: efficacy study.
    Mirvis SE; Diaconis JN; Chirico PA; Reiner BI; Joslyn JN; Militello P
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):831-4. PubMed ID: 2492671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low-risk adults?
    Hunter BR; Keim SM; Seupaul RA; Hern G
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Feb; 46(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 24342907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Implementing traumatic cervical spine clearance clinical practice guidelines.
    Linskey ME
    J Trauma; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1451-2. PubMed ID: 20539188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Cervical spondylolysis as a rare incidental finding after juvenile trauma to the cervical vertebrae-diagnosis with low dose CT].
    Lemburg S; Gothner M; Heyer CM
    Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):612-4. PubMed ID: 20183776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessing cervical spine stability in obtunded blunt trauma patients: review of medical literature.
    Sliker CW; Mirvis SE; Shanmuganathan K
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):733-9. PubMed ID: 15734929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Is MRI essential in C-spine clearance in the obtunded patients with blunt trauma?
    McKee M
    J Trauma; 2008 Feb; 64(2):540-1; author reply 541. PubMed ID: 18301229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Are five-view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status.
    Diaz JJ; Gillman C; Morris JA; May AK; Carrillo YM; Guy J
    J Trauma; 2003 Oct; 55(4):658-63; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 14566119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cervical spine fractures in patients 65 years and older: a clinical prediction rule for blunt trauma.
    Bub LD; Blackmore CC; Mann FA; Lomoschitz FM
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 15564392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Selective application of cervical spine radiography in alert victims of blunt trauma: a prospective study.
    Sumchai AP
    J Trauma; 1988 Dec; 28(12):1686-7. PubMed ID: 3199477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of CT and MRI findings for cervical spine clearance in obtunded patients without high impact trauma.
    Wu X; Durand D; Kalra VB; Liu R; Forman HP; Malhotra A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Jun; 145():106-7. PubMed ID: 26996972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. MRI as an adjunct to cervical spine clearance: a utility analysis.
    Soult MC; Weireter LJ; Britt RC; Collins JN; Novosel TJ; Reed SF; Britt LD
    Am Surg; 2012 Jul; 78(7):741-4. PubMed ID: 22748530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Utility of cervical spinal and abdominal computed tomography in diagnosing occult pneumothorax in patients with blunt trauma: Computed tomographic imaging protocol matters.
    Akoglu H; Akoglu EU; Evman S; Akoglu T; Denizbasi A; Guneysel O; Onur O; Onur E
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Oct; 73(4):874-9. PubMed ID: 22835995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Facilitating cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma.
    Roberge RJ
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 1991 Nov; 9(4):733-42. PubMed ID: 1915045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Screening for thoracolumbar spinal injuries in blunt trauma: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.
    Sixta S; Moore FO; Ditillo MF; Fox AD; Garcia AJ; Holena D; Joseph B; Tyrie L; Cotton B;
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Nov; 73(5 Suppl 4):S326-32. PubMed ID: 23114489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pharyngeal perforation after blunt cervical trauma in child.
    Svetlikova M; Starek I; Spenerova M; Potesil J; Sulla I; Hucko C; Mihal V; Balik V
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 78(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 24290954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.