These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22406866)

  • 21. Primary stability of a cementless modular revision hip stem in relation with the femoral defect size: A biomechanical study.
    Ellenrieder M; Souffrant R; Schulze C; Kluess D; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(3):2309499020948991. PubMed ID: 32909886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A numerical investigation into the influence of the properties of cobalt chrome cellular structures on the load transfer to the periprosthetic femur following total hip arthroplasty.
    Hazlehurst KB; Wang CJ; Stanford M
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Apr; 36(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 24613500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bone restoration after revision hip arthroplasty with femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems with cortical strut allografts.
    Ding Z; Ling T; Mou P; Wang D; Zhou K; Zhou Z
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 May; 15(1):194. PubMed ID: 32460781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Experiences with the BiCONTACT revision stems with distal interlocking.
    Kim YM; Kim HJ; Song WS; Yoo JJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Jan; 19(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 14716647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.
    Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
    Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trade-off between stress shielding and initial stability on an anatomical cementless stem shortening: in-vitro biomechanical study.
    Yamako G; Chosa E; Totoribe K; Watanabe S; Sakamoto T
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):820-5. PubMed ID: 26117334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distal stem features improve the torsional resistance of long-stem cemented revision hip stems: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Holsgrove TP; Petheram TG; Miles AW; Timperley AJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 23637260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Femoral periprosthetic bone remodelling to the proximal femur after implantation of custom made anatomic and standard straight stem hip prostheses].
    Arabmotlagh M; Hennigs T; Rittmeister M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):519-25. PubMed ID: 14551837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Varus malalignment of cementless hip stems provides sufficient primary stability but highly increases distal strain distribution.
    Fottner A; Woiczinski M; Kistler M; Schröder C; Schmidutz TF; Jansson V; Schmidutz F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2018 Oct; 58():14-20. PubMed ID: 30005422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
    Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reconstruction of femoral defects in revision hip surgery: risk of fracture and stem migration after impaction bone grafting.
    Barker R; Takahashi T; Toms A; Gregson P; Kuiper JH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 16720783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Influence on load transfer of different femoral neck endoprostheses].
    Steinhauser E; Ellenrieder M; Gruber G; Busch R; Gradinger R; Mittelmeier W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(4):386-93. PubMed ID: 16941296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tapered vs Cylindrical Stem Fixation in a Model of Femoral Bone Deficiency in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Russell RD; Pierce W; Huo MH
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1352-1355. PubMed ID: 26795255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Failure of cementless fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):335-46. PubMed ID: 1570145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface.
    Sumner DR; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):202-12. PubMed ID: 1729005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.