These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22407257)

  • 1. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on response acquisition with unsignaled delayed reinforcement.
    Doughty AH; Galuska CM; Dawson AE; Brierley KP
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):287-90. PubMed ID: 22407257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.
    Wogar MA; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1496135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response acquisition with signaled delayed reinforcement in a rodent model of ADHD.
    Hand DJ; Fox AT; Reilly MP
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 213(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 20438767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of prefeeding on fixed-ratio pausing is jointly determined by past and upcoming reinforcer magnitudes.
    Galuska CM; Yadon KA
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 20804830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of reinforcement magnitude and ratio values on behaviour maintained by a cyclic ratio schedule of reinforcement.
    Leslie JC; Boyle C; Shaw D
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Nov; 53(4):289-308. PubMed ID: 11131787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating retrospective influences on induction in rats' responding for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 16475670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response acquisition with intermittent immediate and delayed conditioned reinforcement.
    Bermúdez K; Bruner CA; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Mar; 99(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 23355101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body weight and response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.
    Lattal KA; Williams AM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jan; 67(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 9037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.
    Lattal KA; Gleeson S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 2303791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcer concentration effects on a fixed-interval schedule.
    Blomeley FJ; Lowe CF; Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15182926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social reinforcement of operant behavior in rats: a methodological note.
    Evans MJ; Duvel A; Funk ML; Lehman B; Sparrow J; Watson NT; Neuringer A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jul; 62(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 8064210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resistance to extinction following variable-interval reinforcement: reinforcer rate and amount.
    Shull RL; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 16602374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mobini S; Body S; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Mar; 160(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 11889498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice between delayed reinforcers in a discrete-trials schedule: the effect of deprivation level.
    Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jan; 44(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1546183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resurgence and alternative-reinforcer magnitude.
    Craig AR; Browning KO; Nall RW; Marshall CM; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Mar; 107(2):218-233. PubMed ID: 28194793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcer devaluation by extinction depends on the food restriction protocol.
    Baker TW; Weisman RG; Beninger RJ
    Behav Processes; 2012 May; 90(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 22469648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.