BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22407268)

  • 1. Prediction of lower limb functional recovery after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: focusing on the 10-s step test.
    Nakashima H; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kanbara S; Morita D; Takahashi H; Imagama S; Ito Z; Ishiguro N; Kato F
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jul; 21(7):1389-95. PubMed ID: 22407268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological evidence of functional improvement in the corticospinal tract after laminoplasty in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy: clinical article.
    Nakanishi K; Tanaka N; Kamei N; Ohta R; Fujioka Y; Hiramatsu T; Ujigo S; Ochi M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 24855997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of the 10-s step test: prospective study comparing it with the 10-s grip and release test and the 30-m walking test.
    Nakashima H; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kanbara S; Morita D; Imagama S; Hamajima N; Ishiguro N; Kato F
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Aug; 20(8):1318-22. PubMed ID: 21380747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of clinical results of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy focusing on spinal cord motion in intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
    Naruse T; Yanase M; Takahashi H; Horie Y; Ito M; Imaizumi T; Oguri K; Matsuyama Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2634-41. PubMed ID: 19910766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical indicators of surgical outcomes after cervical single open-door laminoplasty assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire.
    Nagoshi N; Tsuji O; Okada E; Fujita N; Yagi M; Tsuji T; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Watanabe K
    Spinal Cord; 2019 Aug; 57(8):644-651. PubMed ID: 30792540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcome of surgical management of mild cervical compressive myelopathy based on minimum clinically important difference.
    Hirai H; Fujishiro T; Nakaya Y; Hayama S; Usami Y; Mizutani M; Nakano A; Neo M
    Spine J; 2024 Jan; 24(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 37660898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resting-state Amplitude of Low-frequency Fluctuation is a Potentially Useful Prognostic Functional Biomarker in Cervical Myelopathy.
    Takenaka S; Kan S; Seymour B; Makino T; Sakai Y; Kushioka J; Tanaka H; Watanabe Y; Shibata M; Yoshikawa H; Kaito T
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):1667-1680. PubMed ID: 32011371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive factors affecting outcome after cervical laminoplasty.
    Yoon ST; Raich A; Hashimoto RE; Riew KD; Shaffrey CI; Rhee JM; Tetreault LA; Skelly AC; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S232-52. PubMed ID: 23962999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diffusion tensor imaging can predict surgical outcomes of patients with cervical compression myelopathy.
    Maki S; Koda M; Kitamura M; Inada T; Kamiya K; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Masuda Y; Matsumoto K; Kojima M; Obata T; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Furuya T
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2459-2466. PubMed ID: 28623403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modified K-line in magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinical outcome in patients with nonlordotic alignment after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Taniyama T; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Yamada T; Yasuda H; Saito M; Inose H; Kato T; Kawabata S; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(21):E1261-8. PubMed ID: 25077905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usefulness of QuickDASH in patients with cervical laminoplasty.
    Nakamoto H; Oshima Y; Takeshita K; Chikuda H; Ono T; Taniguchi Y; Tanaka S
    J Orthop Sci; 2014 Mar; 19(2):218-222. PubMed ID: 24390596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes.
    Yukawa Y; Kato F; Yoshihara H; Yanase M; Ito K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1675-8; discussion 1679. PubMed ID: 17621217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is cervical lordosis relevant in laminoplasty?
    Kim SW; Hai DM; Sundaram S; Kim YC; Park MS; Paik SH; Kwak YH; Kim TH
    Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):914-21. PubMed ID: 23541454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of prognostic factors and clinical outcome in elderly patients in whom expansive laminoplasty is performed for cervical myelopathy due to multisegmental spondylotic canal stenosis. A retrospective comparison with younger patients.
    Handa Y; Kubota T; Ishii H; Sato K; Tsuchida A; Arai Y
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Mar; 96(2 Suppl):173-9. PubMed ID: 12450280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Suda K; Abumi K; Ito M; Shono Y; Kaneda K; Fujiya M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1258-62. PubMed ID: 12811268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Central Motor Conduction Time and Spinal Cord Evoked Potentials in the Electrophysiological Assessment of Compressive Cervical Myelopathy.
    Fujimoto K; Kanchiku T; Imajo Y; Suzuki H; Funaba M; Nishida N; Taguchi T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Jun; 42(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 27792117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Discussion of surgical indications for posterior expansive open-door laminoplasty extended to C1 level].
    Li Q; Kong Q; Zhang L; Sun T; Li T; Gong Q; Song Y; Liu H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 27(10):1214-20. PubMed ID: 24397134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgically treated cervical myelopathy: a functional outcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty.
    Seng C; Tow BP; Siddiqui MA; Srivastava A; Wang L; Yew AK; Yeo W; Khoo SH; Balakrishnan NM; Bin Abd Razak HR; Chen JL; Guo CM; Tan SB; Yue WM
    Spine J; 2013 Jul; 13(7):723-31. PubMed ID: 23541452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy resulting from adjacent-segment disease in patients with previous anterior cervical decompression and fusion.
    Matsumoto M; Nojiri K; Chiba K; Toyama Y; Fukui Y; Kamata M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1332-7. PubMed ID: 16721295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparative Study of Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients With Large Anterior Compression of the Spinal Cord.
    Hirai T; Yoshii T; Arai Y; Sakai K; Torigoe I; Maehara H; Tomori M; Taniyama T; Sato H; Okawa A
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1137-E1142. PubMed ID: 28099187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.