These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22407388)

  • 1. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Dec; 18(9):666-73. PubMed ID: 20010245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Renier C; Zeyen T; Fieuws S; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I
    Int Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 30(6):651-9. PubMed ID: 20499265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
    Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
    Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative importance of factors affecting corneal hysteresis measurement.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Katiyar S; Pensyl D; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 May; 89(5):E803-11. PubMed ID: 22426173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.