BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22408191)

  • 1. The automatic annotation of bacterial genomes.
    Richardson EJ; Watson M
    Brief Bioinform; 2013 Jan; 14(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 22408191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The GEA pipeline for characterizing Escherichia coli and Salmonella genomes.
    Dickey AM; Schmidt JW; Bono JL; Guragain M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):13257. PubMed ID: 38858528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-throughput comparison, functional annotation, and metabolic modeling of plant genomes using the PlantSEED resource.
    Seaver SM; Gerdes S; Frelin O; Lerma-Ortiz C; Bradbury LM; Zallot R; Hasnain G; Niehaus TD; El Yacoubi B; Pasternak S; Olson R; Pusch G; Overbeek R; Stevens R; de Crécy-Lagard V; Ware D; Hanson AD; Henry CS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(26):9645-50. PubMed ID: 24927599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BG7: a new approach for bacterial genome annotation designed for next generation sequencing data.
    Pareja-Tobes P; Manrique M; Pareja-Tobes E; Pareja E; Tobes R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49239. PubMed ID: 23185310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MicrobeAnnotator: a user-friendly, comprehensive functional annotation pipeline for microbial genomes.
    Ruiz-Perez CA; Conrad RE; Konstantinidis KT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):11. PubMed ID: 33407081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene calling and bacterial genome annotation with BG7.
    Tobes R; Pareja-Tobes P; Manrique M; Pareja-Tobes E; Kovach E; Alekhin A; Pareja E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1231():177-89. PubMed ID: 25343866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genome annotation techniques: new approaches and challenges.
    Rust AG; Mongin E; Birney E
    Drug Discov Today; 2002 Jun; 7(11):S70-6. PubMed ID: 12047883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MyPro: A seamless pipeline for automated prokaryotic genome assembly and annotation.
    Liao YC; Lin HH; Sabharwal A; Haase EM; Scannapieco FA
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():72-4. PubMed ID: 25911337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A post-assembly genome-improvement toolkit (PAGIT) to obtain annotated genomes from contigs.
    Swain MT; Tsai IJ; Assefa SA; Newbold C; Berriman M; Otto TD
    Nat Protoc; 2012 Jun; 7(7):1260-84. PubMed ID: 22678431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manual Gene Curation and Functional Annotation.
    McDonnell E; Strasser K; Tsang A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1775():185-208. PubMed ID: 29876819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. REPARATION: ribosome profiling assisted (re-)annotation of bacterial genomes.
    Ndah E; Jonckheere V; Giess A; Valen E; Menschaert G; Van Damme P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Nov; 45(20):e168. PubMed ID: 28977509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GASS: genome structural annotation for Eukaryotes based on species similarity.
    Wang Y; Chen L; Song N; Lei X
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):150. PubMed ID: 25764973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. VIGOR, an annotation program for small viral genomes.
    Wang S; Sundaram JP; Spiro D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 11():451. PubMed ID: 20822531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genix: a new online automated pipeline for bacterial genome annotation.
    Kremer FS; Eslabão MR; Dellagostin OA; Pinto LD
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2016 Dec; 363(23):. PubMed ID: 27856568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ISsaga is an ensemble of web-based methods for high throughput identification and semi-automatic annotation of insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes.
    Varani AM; Siguier P; Gourbeyre E; Charneau V; Chandler M
    Genome Biol; 2011; 12(3):R30. PubMed ID: 21443786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple, Reliable, and Time-Efficient Manual Annotation of Bacterial Genomes with MAISEN.
    Dziurzynski M; Decewicz P; Ciuchcinski K; Gorecki A; Dziewit L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2242():221-229. PubMed ID: 33961227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduce manual curation by combining gene predictions from multiple annotation engines, a case study of start codon prediction.
    Ederveen TH; Overmars L; van Hijum SA
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63523. PubMed ID: 23675487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BEACON: automated tool for Bacterial GEnome Annotation ComparisON.
    Kalkatawi M; Alam I; Bajic VB
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):616. PubMed ID: 26283419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phage Genome Annotation Using the RAST Pipeline.
    McNair K; Aziz RK; Pusch GD; Overbeek R; Dutilh BE; Edwards R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1681():231-238. PubMed ID: 29134599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation.
    Bernt M; Donath A; Jühling F; Externbrink F; Florentz C; Fritzsch G; Pütz J; Middendorf M; Stadler PF
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 Nov; 69(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 22982435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.