These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22408696)

  • 1. Preliminary clinical evaluation of short fiber-reinforced composite resin in posterior teeth: 12-months report.
    Garoushi S; Tanner J; Vallittu P; Lassila L
    Open Dent J; 2012; 6():41-5. PubMed ID: 22408696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short fiber reinforced composite: a new alternative for direct onlay restorations.
    Garoushi S; Mangoush E; Vallittu M; Lassila L
    Open Dent J; 2013; 7():181-5. PubMed ID: 24511331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 12-months Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Restoration of Deep Proximal Lesions of Permanent Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Salem MN; Hassanein OE; ElKassas DW; Shaalan OO
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2022 Sep; 56(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 36382215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Performance of Short-fiber-reinforced Resin Composite Restorations vs Resin Composite Onlay Restorations in Complex Cavities of Molars (Randomized Clinical Trial).
    ElAziz RH; Mohammed MM; Gomaa HA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Mar; 21(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 32434978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance of fiber-reinforced nanofilled resin composite in extensively carious posterior teeth of children: 30-month evaluation.
    Candan U; Eronat N; Onçağ O
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 38(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24579274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of posterior flowable short fiber-reinforced composite restorations without proximal surface coverage.
    ElAziz RHA; ElAziz SAA; ElAziz PMA; Frater M; Vallittu PK; Lassila L; Garoushi S
    Odontology; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38393515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations.
    Garoushi SK; Hatem M; Lassila LVJ; Vallittu PK
    Acta Biomater Odontol Scand; 2015 Jan; 1(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 28642894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstruction of nonvital teeth using direct fiber-reinforced composite resin: a pilot clinical study.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Feb; 11(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 19343930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of large MOD restorations: Composite resin inlays vs. short fiber-reinforced direct restorations.
    Soares LM; Razaghy M; Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2018 Apr; 34(4):587-597. PubMed ID: 29366492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
    Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.
    Yip KH; Poon BK; Chu FC; Poon EC; Kong FY; Smales RJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1581-9. PubMed ID: 14719754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.