These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Shifting development in mid-childhood: the influence of between-task interference. Cragg L; Nation K Dev Psychol; 2009 Sep; 45(5):1465-79. PubMed ID: 19702406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search? Klapetek A; Ngo MK; Spence C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 22648604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence of reduced selective attention in schizotypal personality disorder. Breeze JM; Kirkham AJ; MarĂ-Beffa P J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Aug; 33(7):776-84. PubMed ID: 21526445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of unattended features on object processing depends on task demand. Mayer KM; Vuong QC Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 56():20-7. PubMed ID: 22306678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Lawo V; Philipp AM; Schuch S; Koch I Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22468851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Holistic processing of impossible objects: evidence from Garner's speeded-classification task. Freud E; Avidan G; Ganel T Vision Res; 2013 Dec; 93():10-8. PubMed ID: 24121070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Garner interference is not solely driven by stimulus uncertainty. Burns DM Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1846-1853. PubMed ID: 27246090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cue-task associations in task switching. Gade M; Koch I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 17514592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching. Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological correlates of preparation and implementation for different types of task shifts. Hsieh S; Wu M Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1423():41-52. PubMed ID: 22000079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness? Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 20853997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision. Murray MM; De Santis L; Thut G; Wylie GR Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 18571299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition. Altmann EM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual and conceptual priming of cue encoding in task switching. Schneider DW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1112-26. PubMed ID: 26766605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]