183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22410176)
1. A regulatory approach to assess the potency of substances toxic to the reproduction.
Muller A; Blaude MN; Ihlemann C; Bjorge C; Ohlsson A; Gebel T
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jun; 63(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 22410176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the impact of second generation mating and offspring in multi-generation reproductive toxicity studies on classification and labelling of substances in Europe.
Rorije E; Muller A; Beekhuijzen ME; Hass U; Heinrich-Hirsch B; Paparella M; Schenk E; Ulbrich B; Hakkert BC; Piersma AH
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Nov; 61(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 21878359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
Dent MP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A retrospective analysis of the added value of the rat two-generation reproductive toxicity study versus the rat subchronic toxicity study.
Janer G; Hakkert BC; Piersma AH; Vermeire T; Slob W
Reprod Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 24(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17600672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating potency into EU classification for carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity.
Hennes C; Batke M; Bomann W; Duhayon S; Kosemund K; Politano V; Stinchcombe S; Doe J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Nov; 70(2):457-67. PubMed ID: 25092129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health effects classification and its role in the derivation of minimal risk levels: reproductive and endocrine effects.
Pohl HR; Luukinen B; Holler JS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 42(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 15921838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of reproductive toxicity under REACH.
Aulmann W
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 63(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 22475931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of reproductive toxicity and classification of glufosinate-ammonium.
Schulte-Hermann R; Wogan GN; Berry C; Brown NA; Czeizel A; Giavini E; Holmes LB; Kroes R; Nau H; Neubert D; Oesch F; Ott T; Pelkonen O; Robert-Gnansia E; Sullivan FM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Apr; 44(3 Suppl 1):S1-76. PubMed ID: 16510221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment.
Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T
Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral (gavage) two-generation (one litter per generation) reproduction study of pentachlorophenol (penta) in rats.
Bernard BK; Hoberman AM; Brown WR; Ranpuria AK; Christian MS
Int J Toxicol; 2002; 21(4):301-18. PubMed ID: 12171631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of chemical structure with reproductive and developmental toxicity as it relates to the use of the threshold of toxicological concern.
Laufersweiler MC; Gadagbui B; Baskerville-Abraham IM; Maier A; Willis A; Scialli AR; Carr GJ; Felter SP; Blackburn K; Daston G
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 62(1):160-82. PubMed ID: 22019814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An assessment of the developmental, reproductive, and neurotoxicity of endosulfan.
Silva MH; Gammon D
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Feb; 86(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 19243027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utilizing uncertainty factors in minimal risk levels derivation.
Pohl HR; Abadin HG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Oct; 22(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 8577953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical aspects in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.
Buschmann J
Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 16782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive toxicants have a threshold of adversity.
Piersma AH; Hernandez LG; van Benthem J; Muller JJ; van Leeuwen FX; Vermeire TG; van Raaij MT
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 41(6):545-54. PubMed ID: 21609253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Products toxic to reproduction used in the occupational environment: Definition, risk assessment, classification].
Lafon D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Oct; 34(10):950-4. PubMed ID: 16997605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Suitability of the limit dose in evaluating reproductive toxicity of substances and preparations.
Schneider K; Oltmanns J; Van Gelder R; Gebel T
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26(3):183-95. PubMed ID: 17564899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products.
Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comprehensive model for reproductive and developmental toxicity hazard identification: I. Development of a weight of evidence QSAR database.
Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Daniel Benz R; Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 47(2):115-35. PubMed ID: 17207562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
