These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22410336)

  • 21. Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.
    Xue W; Zhang L; Mou X; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Feb; 23(2):684-95. PubMed ID: 26270911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image quality assessment based on the perceived structural similarity index of an image.
    Yao J; Shen J; Yao C
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Mar; 20(5):9385-9409. PubMed ID: 37161248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application-Driven No-Reference Quality Assessment for Dermoscopy Images With Multiple Distortions.
    Xie F; Lu Y; Bovik AC; Jiang Z; Meng R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jun; 63(6):1248-56. PubMed ID: 26513774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual Quality Assessment for Multi-Exposure Image Fusion.
    Ma K; Zeng K; Wang Z
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Nov; 24(11):3345-56. PubMed ID: 26068317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality assessment by visual gradient similarity.
    Zhu J; Wang N
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Mar; 21(3):919-33. PubMed ID: 21965204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Image quality assessment based on gradient similarity.
    Liu A; Lin W; Narwaria M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Apr; 21(4):1500-12. PubMed ID: 22106145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. BM-IQE: An Image Quality Evaluator with Block-Matching for Both Real-Life Scenes and Remote Sensing Scenes.
    Xu N; Ma D; Ren G; Huang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32575567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. No-Reference Quality Assessment of Authentically Distorted Images Based on Local and Global Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2022 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 35735972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. No-Reference Quality Metric of Contrast-Distorted Images Based on Information Maximization.
    Gu K; Lin W; Zhai G; Yang X; Zhang W; Chen CW
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2017 Dec; 47(12):4559-4565. PubMed ID: 27323391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blind Quality Estimation by Disentangling Perceptual and Noisy Features in High Dynamic Range Images.
    Kottayil NK; Valenzise G; Dufaux F; Cheng I
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Mar; 27(3):1512-1525. PubMed ID: 29990064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Gabor Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Screen Content Images.
    Ni Z; Zeng H; Ma L; Hou J; Chen J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Sep; 27(9):4516-4528. PubMed ID: 29897876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reduced-reference IQA in contourlet domain.
    Tao D; Li X; Lu W; Gao X
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2009 Dec; 39(6):1623-7. PubMed ID: 19457752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. No-reference image quality assessment of magnetic resonance images with high-boost filtering and local features.
    Oszust M; Piórkowski A; Obuchowicz R
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Sep; 84(3):1648-1660. PubMed ID: 32052485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fractal analysis for reduced reference image quality assessment.
    Xu Y; Liu D; Quan Y; Le Callet P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jul; 24(7):2098-109. PubMed ID: 25794391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fine-Grained Quality Assessment for Compressed Images.
    Zhang X; Lin W; Wang S; Liu J; Ma S; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Mar; 28(3):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 30296227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Structural similarity quality metrics in a coding context: exploring the space of realistic distortions.
    Brooks AC; Zhao X; Pappas TN
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Aug; 17(8):1261-73. PubMed ID: 18632337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment.
    Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic no-reference image quality assessment.
    Li H; Hu W; Xu ZN
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1097. PubMed ID: 27468398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sparse feature fidelity for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Chang HW; Yang H; Gan Y; Wang MH
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Oct; 22(10):4007-18. PubMed ID: 23751962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.