389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22410390)
1. Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.
Yim GW; Lee M; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
Surg Innov; 2013 Feb; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 22410390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes.
Lee YY; Kim TJ; Kim CJ; Park HS; Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee JH; Bae DS; Kim BG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Aug; 151(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 20392556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes.
Yim GW; Jung YW; Paek J; Lee SH; Kwon HY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim JH; Kim YT; Kim SW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):26.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20417481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy mean reduced pain? A retrospective cohort analysis between SPA and conventional laparoscopy.
Kim TJ; Lee YY; An JJ; Choi CH; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 May; 162(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 22336230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Colombo G; Uccella S; Bergamini V; Serati M; Bolis P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(6):480-5. PubMed ID: 16337574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery.
Kim TJ; Lee YY; Kim MJ; Kim CJ; Kang H; Choi CH; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):612-5. PubMed ID: 19835804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial.
Hoyer-Sørensen C; Vistad I; Ballard K
Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):973-9. PubMed ID: 22769732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors: a comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative pain outcomes.
Im KS; Koo YJ; Kim JB; Kwon YS
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Mar; 27(3):91-5. PubMed ID: 21421196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease: a comparative study.
Bedaiwy MA; Starks D; Hurd W; Escobar PF
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 73(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 22456304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease.
Escobar PF; Bedaiwy MA; Fader AN; Falcone T
Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):2074.e7-10. PubMed ID: 20100614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of postoperative pain after transumbilical single-port access and conventional three-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Chung JH; Baek JM; Chung K; Park EK; Jeung IC; Chang HT; Choi JH; Kim CJ; Lee YS
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Dec; 94(12):1290-6. PubMed ID: 26342188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-port vs. conventional multi-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes and complications.
Choi YS; Park JN; Oh YS; Sin KS; Choi J; Eun DS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(2):366-9. PubMed ID: 23664457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Isobaric laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with wound retractor for adnexal tumors: a single center experience with the initial 100 cases.
Takeda A; Imoto S; Mori M; Nakano T; Nakamura H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 21470765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for treatment of benign adnexal disease: single-center experience over 3-years.
Fagotti A; Bottoni C; Vizzielli G; Rossitto C; Tortorella L; Monterossi G; Fanfani F; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):695-700. PubMed ID: 23084672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: a randomized trial.
Chou LY; Sheu BC; Chang DY; Huang SC; Chen SY; Hsu WC; Chang WC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Dec; 153(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 20705381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-Port Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy in Benign Adnexal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Schmitt A; Crochet P; Knight S; Tourette C; Loundou A; Agostini A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1083-1095. PubMed ID: 28705751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery with a multichannel port using a wound retractor: is it safe and minimally scarring?
Yi SW
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Dec; 19(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 19694570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.
Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Cadeddu JA
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18715694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-port laparoscopic surgery for benign salpingo-ovarian pathology: a single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.
Al-Badawi IA; AlOmar O; Albadawi N; Abu-Zaid A
Ann Saudi Med; 2016; 36(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 26809202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction.
Hisada M; Katsumata K; Ishizaki T; Enomoto M; Matsudo T; Kasuya K; Tsuchida A
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 20(44):16707-13. PubMed ID: 25469041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
