279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22410549)
1. Familiarity of environmental sounds is used to establish auditory rules.
Kirmse U; Schröger E; Jacobsen T
Neuroreport; 2012 Mar; 23(5):320-4. PubMed ID: 22410549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Familiarity affects environmental sound processing outside the focus of attention: an event-related potential study.
Kirmse U; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):887-96. PubMed ID: 19345610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.
Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Winkler I; Horváth J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of sound familiarity on the event-related potentials elicited by novel environmental sounds.
Cycowicz YM; Friedman D
Brain Cogn; 1998 Feb; 36(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 9500881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Newborns discriminate novel from harmonic sounds: a study using magnetoencephalography.
Sambeth A; Huotilainen M; Kushnerenko E; Fellman V; Pihko E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 16426892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lasting first impressions: a conservative bias in automatic filters of the acoustic environment.
Todd J; Provost A; Cooper G
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3399-405. PubMed ID: 21872613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Memory-based detection of rare sound feature combinations in anesthetized rats.
Astikainen P; Ruusuvirta T; Wikgren J; Penttonen M
Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(14):1561-4. PubMed ID: 16957608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The utility of brief, spectrally rich, dynamic sounds in the passive oddball paradigm.
Horváth J; Roeber U; Schröger E
Neurosci Lett; 2009 Sep; 461(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 19545606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiological markers of voice familiarity.
Beauchemin M; De Beaumont L; Vannasing P; Turcotte A; Arcand C; Belin P; Lassonde M
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 23(11):3081-6. PubMed ID: 16819998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual and conceptual priming of environmental sounds.
Schirmer A; Soh YH; Penney TB; Wyse L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3241-53. PubMed ID: 21281092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
Beer AL; Röder B
Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implicit, intuitive, and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: an event-related brain potential study.
van Zuijen TL; Simoens VL; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R; Tervaniemi M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1292-303. PubMed ID: 16859415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal integration of deviant sound in automatic detection reflected by mismatch negativity.
Shiga T; Yabe H; Yu L; Nozaki M; Itagaki S; Lan TH; Niwa S
Neuroreport; 2011 May; 22(7):337-41. PubMed ID: 21502927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Activation and application of an obligatory phonotactic constraint in German during automatic speech processing is revealed by human event-related potentials.
Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jul; 77(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20381548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds.
Müller D; Widmann A; Schröger E
Psychophysiology; 2005 Nov; 42(6):668-76. PubMed ID: 16364062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
Tervaniemi M; Kruck S; De Baene W; Schröger E; Alter K; Friederici AD
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre-attentive and attentive processing of temporal and frequency characteristics within long sounds.
Grimm S; Schröger E
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):711-21. PubMed ID: 16253485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
