190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22411279)
21. Perception of acoustically degraded sentences in bilingual listeners who differ in age of english acquisition.
Shi LF
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 20220026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise.
Ozimek E; Kutzner D; Sek A; Wicher A
Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):433-43. PubMed ID: 19925330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
Liu C; Jin SH
Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contribution of linguistic variables to bilingual listeners' perception of degraded English sentences.
Shi LF
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):219-34. PubMed ID: 22199200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spanish/English bilingual listeners on clinical word recognition tests: what to expect and how to predict.
Shi LF; Sánchez D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1096-110. PubMed ID: 20689035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Speech audiometry in Estonia: Estonian words in noise (EWIN) test.
Veispak A; Jansen S; Ghesquière P; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug; 54(8):573-8. PubMed ID: 25812043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Cross-Language Comparison of Sentence Recognition Using American English and Mandarin Chinese HINT and AzBio Sentences.
Xu L; Xi X; Patton A; Wang X; Qi B; Johnson L
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):405-413. PubMed ID: 32826510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bilingual listeners' perception of temporally manipulated English passages.
Shi LF; Farooq N
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 22199197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Psychometrically equivalent Russian speech audiometry materials by male and female talkers.
Harris RW; Nissen SL; Pola MG; McPherson DL; Tavartkiladze GA; Eggett DL
Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 17365055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment.
Coene M; Krijger S; Meeuws M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts PJ
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7249848. PubMed ID: 27830152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Non-native speech recognition sentences: A new materials set for non-native speech perception research.
Stringer L; Iverson P
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Apr; 52(2):561-571. PubMed ID: 31012064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Learning words and rules: abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension.
Gertner Y; Fisher C; Eisengart J
Psychol Sci; 2006 Aug; 17(8):684-91. PubMed ID: 16913951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. LiCoS: A New Linguistically Controlled Sentences Test to Assess Functional Hearing Performance.
Coene M; Krijger S; van Knijff E; Meeuws M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts PJ
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2018; 70(2):90-99. PubMed ID: 30041186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of age and native language on immediate verbal repetition.
Burda AN; Bradley-Potter M; Dralle J; Murphy J; Ries S; Roehs A
Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Aug; 109(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 19831098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Forced-choice analysis of segmental production by Chinese-accented English speakers.
Rogers CL; Dalby J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 15989394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
Wu X; Yang Z; Huang Y; Chen J; Li L; Daneman M; Schneider BA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development of equally intelligible Telugu sentence-lists to test speech recognition in noise.
Tanniru K; Narne VK; Jain C; Konadath S; Singh NK; Sreenivas KJR; K A
Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):664-671. PubMed ID: 28395544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
