These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22411582)

  • 21. Anticipatory Postural Adjustments associated with reaching movements are programmed according to the availability of visual information.
    Esposti R; Bruttini C; Bolzoni F; Cavallari P
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1349-1360. PubMed ID: 28213690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
    Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Motor preparation for compensatory reach-to-grasp responses when viewing a wall-mounted safety handle.
    Bolton DAE; Cole DM; Butler B; Mansour M; Rydalch G; McDannald DW; Schwartz SE
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():135-146. PubMed ID: 30974321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hand shaping using hapsis resembles visually guided hand shaping.
    Karl JM; Sacrey LA; Doan JB; Whishaw IQ
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 May; 219(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 22437961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in Parkinson's disease.
    Rand MK; Smiley-Oyen AL; Shimansky YP; Bloedel JR; Stelmach GE
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):131-42. PubMed ID: 16307233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):349-71. PubMed ID: 16707178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonvisual learning of intrinsic object properties in a reaching task dissociates grasp from reach.
    Karl JM; Schneider LR; Whishaw IQ
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 225(4):465-77. PubMed ID: 23288327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history.
    Tang R; Zhu H
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2215-2224. PubMed ID: 28451736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Haptic grasping configurations in early infancy reveal different developmental profiles for visual guidance of the Reach versus the Grasp.
    Karl JM; Whishaw IQ
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 232(10):3301-16. PubMed ID: 24969613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes to online control and eye-hand coordination with healthy ageing.
    O'Rielly JL; Ma-Wyatt A
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Jun; 59():244-257. PubMed ID: 29747069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.
    Worssam CJ; Meade LC; Connolly JD
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):385-96. PubMed ID: 25311388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On-line control of grasping actions: object-specific motor facilitation requires sustained visual input.
    Prabhu G; Lemon R; Haggard P
    J Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 27(46):12651-4. PubMed ID: 18003844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Utilization of visual feedback of the hand according to target view availability in the online control of prehension movements.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):580-95. PubMed ID: 24054896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Touch the table before the target: contact with an underlying surface may assist the development of precise visually controlled reach and grasp movements in human infants.
    Karl JM; Wilson AM; Bertoli ME; Shubear NS
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2185-2207. PubMed ID: 29797280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Age-related changes in the capacity to select early-onset upper-limb reactions to either recover balance or protect against impact.
    Borrelli JR; Zabukovec J; Jones S; Junod CA; Maki BE
    Exp Gerontol; 2019 Oct; 125():110676. PubMed ID: 31377381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When adaptive control fails: Slow recovery of reduced rapid online control during reaching under reversed vision.
    Kuang S; Gail A
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):155-65. PubMed ID: 25218421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reach to grasp: the response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size.
    Castiello U; Bennett K; Chambers H
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 May; 120(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 9628401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.
    Grant S; Conway ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1239-1255. PubMed ID: 30850853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gaze strategies during visually-guided versus memory-guided grasping.
    Prime SL; Marotta JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 23239197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Arm reactions evoked by the initial exposure to a small balance perturbation: a pilot study.
    Corbeil P; Bloem BR; van Meel M; Maki BE
    Gait Posture; 2013 Feb; 37(2):300-3. PubMed ID: 22925376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.