These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22411620)

  • 1. The Thatcher illusion in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).
    Nakata R; Osada Y
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Jul; 15(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 22411620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face processing at birth: a Thatcher illusion study.
    Leo I; Simion F
    Dev Sci; 2009 Apr; 12(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 19371374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How the Thatcher illusion reveals evolutionary differences in the face processing of primates.
    Weldon KB; Taubert J; Smith CL; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Sep; 16(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 23420511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inversion and configuration of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Searcy J
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jul; 25(3):281-316. PubMed ID: 8354050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural Correlate of the Thatcher Face Illusion in a Monkey Face-Selective Patch.
    Taubert J; Van Belle G; Vanduffel W; Rossion B; Vogels R
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9872-8. PubMed ID: 26156988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An inversion effect modified by expertise in capuchin monkeys.
    Pokorny JJ; Webb CE; de Waal FB
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Nov; 14(6):839-46. PubMed ID: 21573949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An examination of the processing capacity of features in the Thatcher illusion.
    Donnelly N; Cornes K; Menneer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1475-87. PubMed ID: 22707354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia).
    Phelps MT; Roberts WA
    J Comp Psychol; 1994 Jun; 108(2):114-25. PubMed ID: 8026162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential sensitivity to rotations of facial features in the Thatcher illusion.
    Riby DM; Riby LM; Reay JL
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):721-6. PubMed ID: 20099533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual and decisional factors influencing the discrimination of inversion in the Thatcher illusion.
    Cornes K; Donnelly N; Godwin H; Wenger MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):645-68. PubMed ID: 21639673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do children with autism perceive second-order relational features? The case of the Thatcher illusion.
    Rouse H; Donnelly N; Hadwin JA; Brown T
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 45(7):1246-57. PubMed ID: 15335345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding facial emotion perception in Parkinson's disease: the role of configural processing.
    Narme P; Bonnet AM; Dubois B; Chaby L
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3295-302. PubMed ID: 21856319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thatcher effect in monkeys demonstrates conservation of face perception across primates.
    Adachi I; Chou DP; Hampton RR
    Curr Biol; 2009 Aug; 19(15):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19559613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are monkeys aesthetists? Rensch (1957) revisited.
    Anderson JR; Kuwahata H; Kuroshima H; Leighty KA; Fujita K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 15656728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) predict that looking leads to touching?
    Anderson JR; Kuroshima H; Kuwahata H; Fujita K
    Anim Cogn; 2004 Jul; 7(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 15022054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The eyes or the mouth? Feature salience and unfamiliar face processing in Williams syndrome and autism.
    Riby DM; Doherty-Sneddon G; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):189-203. PubMed ID: 18609381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.