These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22413658)

  • 1. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Cameron N
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
    Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of 'learning credits' by GP appraisers.
    Murie J; Wakeling J
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 22413657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strengthening medical appraisal: reactions to proposals for a new appraisal system to support revalidation.
    Ball K; Lyons N; Conlon M; Critchley R
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 22413662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GP experiences of partner and external peer appraisal: a qualitative study.
    McKinstry B; Peacock H; Shaw J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jul; 55(516):539-43. PubMed ID: 16004740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How should we train consultant appraisers? Description and evaluation of a pilot training model developed in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Staples I; Cameron N
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Jun; 18(3):547-54. PubMed ID: 21255201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?
    Murie J; McCrae J; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2009 Jan; 20(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19618650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
    Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sessional GPs: support needed to provide the evidence required for appraisal and revalidation.
    Wharton R; Pollard K
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 Sep; 21(5):308-15. PubMed ID: 20868546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature.
    Scallan S; Locke R; Eksteen D; Caesar S
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 26915657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal.
    Finlay K; McLaren S
    Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20051189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The experience and professional development of medical appraisers.
    Locke R; Bell J; Scallan S; Ozguler B; Caesar S
    Educ Prim Care; 2018 Nov; 29(6):351-356. PubMed ID: 30246615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
    Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice.
    Dale J; Potter R; Owen K; Leach J
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Jul; 17():84. PubMed ID: 27439982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.
    Bowie P; Cameron N; Staples I; McMillan R; McKay J; Lough M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2009 Jul; 59(564):484-9. PubMed ID: 19566997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of further training for GP appraisers in Scotland.
    Staples I; Wakeling J; Cameron N
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 Jan; 21(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 20202318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London's responsible officers and their appraisers.
    Griffin A; Furmedge DS; Gill D; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Noble L; Field R; Ingham Clark C
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 15():152. PubMed ID: 26392086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits of appraisal as perceived by general practitioners.
    Mugweni K; Kibble S; Conlon M
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):393-8. PubMed ID: 22413660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using emotional intelligence to facilitate strengthened appraiser development.
    Tavabie A; Koczwara A; Patterson F
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 Jan; 21(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 20202316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.